Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Rust crate lexical to v7.0.4 #5860

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Update Rust crate lexical to v7.0.4 #5860

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Dec 11, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
lexical workspace.dependencies patch =7.0.3 -> =7.0.4

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge December 11, 2024 19:37
@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team December 11, 2024 19:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.99%. Comparing base (417362f) to head (a856228).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5860      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   23.00%   22.99%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         568      571       +3     
  Lines       19160    19292     +132     
  Branches     2715     2728      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         4408     4436      +28     
- Misses      14700    14803     +103     
- Partials       52       53       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
apps.hash-api 1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 62.18% <ø> (-3.01%) ⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils 8.81% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk 58.62% <ø> (-41.38%) ⬇️
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 1.00% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer 6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif 87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$56.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.292 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$53.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.245 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$97.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$90.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 669 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$95.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.890 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$1.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.596 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.48 \mathrm{s} \pm 825 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-35.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$179 \mathrm{ms} \pm 856 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.46 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.96 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.056 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.565 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.50 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.55 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 11, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 084dd36 Dec 11, 2024
165 of 166 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/rs/lexical-7.x branch December 11, 2024 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants