Update npm package lefthook to v1.9.1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
lefthook	devDependencies	patch	1.9.0 -> 1.9.1

---

Release Notes

evilmartians/lefthook (lefthook)

v1.9.1

Compare Source

• fix: skip_lfs config option (#​889) by @​zachahn

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.90%. Comparing base (c06cca1) to head (d33e120).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5870      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.95%   22.90%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         571      572       +1     
  Lines       19278    19389     +111     
  Branches     2727     2745      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits         4426     4442      +16     
- Misses      14799    14894      +95     
  Partials       53       53              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	58.98% <ø> (-3.11%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.801 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 402 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$52.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 378 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$79.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.51 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.53 \mathrm{s} \pm 832 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-35.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$179 \mathrm{ms} \pm 896 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.60 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.08 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.22 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.51 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.661 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.60 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph