Update npm package eslint to v9.17.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
eslint (source)	devDependencies	minor	9.16.0 -> 9.17.0
eslint (source)	dependencies	minor	9.16.0 -> 9.17.0

---

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.17.0

Compare Source

Features

• eed91d1 feat: add suggestions to no-unused-vars (#​18352) (Tanuj Kanti)

Bug Fixes

• 67d683d fix: fix crash when message.fix is nullish (#​19168) (ntnyq)
• c618707 fix: ignore vars with non-identifier references in no-useless-assignment (#​19200) (YeonJuan)

Documentation

• 3c22d2a docs: update yoda to Yoda in yoda.md for consistency (#​19230) (루밀LuMir)
• e0a2203 docs: add missing backticks to no-sequences (#​19233) (루밀LuMir)
• 4cc4881 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 3db6fdf docs: [no-await-in-loop] expand on benefits and inapplicability (#​19211) (Kirk Waiblinger)
• bf2a4f6 docs: add missing backticks to func-style (#​19227) (루밀LuMir)
• ba098bd docs: add missing header to prefer-spread (#​19224) (루밀LuMir)
• b607ae6 docs: update description of no-param-reassign (#​19220) (루밀LuMir)
• 1eb424d docs: add missing backticks to prefer-destructuring (#​19223) (루밀LuMir)
• 85998d1 docs: add missing backticks to no-unneeded-ternary (#​19222) (루밀LuMir)
• b75b32c docs: add missing backticks to no-new-func (#​19219) (루밀LuMir)
• a7700bc docs: add missing backticks to id-length (#​19217) (루밀LuMir)
• e2bb429 docs: add missing backticks to complexity.md (#​19214) (루밀LuMir)
• 045d716 docs: add missing ) to id-denylist (#​19213) (루밀LuMir)
• 7fe4114 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• c743ba6 docs: add CSS language to no-restricted-syntax (#​19208) (Milos Djermanovic)
• 1416d70 docs: add missing backticks to eqeqeq (#​19207) (루밀LuMir)
• b950c1b docs: add missing backticks to prefer-object-spread (#​19206) (루밀LuMir)
• 8a941cb docs: update docs and description of require-unicode-regexp (#​19205) (루밀LuMir)
• cbab228 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• f2257ce docs: update comments and description of no-script-url (#​19203) (루밀LuMir)
• 365f0f4 docs: add missing backtick to default-case-last (#​19202) (루밀LuMir)
• e6b84f5 docs: add missing punctuation in document (#​19161) (루밀LuMir)
• c88708e docs: replace quote with backtick in description of for-direction (#​19199) (루밀LuMir)
• a76f233 docs: use higher contrast color tokens for code comments (#​19187) (Josh Goldberg ✨)
• db19502 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)

Chores

• cc243c9 chore: upgrade to @eslint/js@9.17.0 (#​19242) (Francesco Trotta)
• 84c5787 chore: package.json update for @​eslint/js release (Jenkins)
• 4c4f53b chore: add missing backticks to flags.js (#​19226) (루밀LuMir)
• 4b3132c chore: update dependency eslint-plugin-expect-type to ^0.6.0 (#​19221) (renovate[bot])
• 9bf2204 chore: add type definitions for the eslint-config-eslint package (#​19050) (Arya Emami)
• ee8c220 chore: fix incorrect name property in integration-tutorial-code (#​19218) (루밀LuMir)
• cca801d chore: Upgrade cross-spawn to 7.0.6 (#​19185) (folortin)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.86%. Comparing base (a0e38fe) to head (7112f69).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5910      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.90%   22.86%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         572      573       +1     
  Lines       19394    19445      +51     
  Branches     2746     2754       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         4442     4447       +5     
- Misses      14899    14945      +46     
  Partials       53       53              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	58.22% <ø> (-1.47%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.698 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 490 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 574 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$78.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$86.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$91.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 528 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.351 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.58 \mathrm{s} \pm 281 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$178 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.20 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.609 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.46 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.12 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph