Update Rust crate jsonschema to v0.26.2 - autoclosed

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
jsonschema	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.26.1 -> =0.26.2

---

Release Notes

Stranger6667/jsonschema (jsonschema)

v0.26.2

Documentation

• Fix documentation for validate

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.72%. Comparing base (c6d0d1c) to head (3050f7e).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5932      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.86%   21.72%   -1.15%     
==========================================
  Files         573      566       -7     
  Lines       19445    19157     -288     
  Branches     2754     2752       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         4447     4162     -285     
+ Misses      14945    14943       -2     
+ Partials       53       52       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.17% <ø> (-8.05%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.153 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 585 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.124 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$94.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 543 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$79.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$86.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 531 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$90.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 491 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.70 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.62 \mathrm{s} \pm 285 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}2009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}31.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$177 \mathrm{ms} \pm 710 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.31 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.01 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.51 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph