Update effect npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@effect/platform (source)	devDependencies	patch	0.71.5 -> 0.71.6
@effect/platform-node (source)	devDependencies	patch	0.67.1 -> 0.67.2
effect (source)	dependencies	patch	3.11.8 -> 3.11.9

---

Release Notes

Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/platform)

v0.71.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [1c08a0b, 1ce703b, 1ce703b]:
  • effect@3.11.9

Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/platform-node)

v0.67.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [1c08a0b, 1ce703b, 1ce703b]:
  • effect@3.11.9
  • @​effect/platform@​0.71.6
  • @​effect/platform-node-shared@​0.21.6

Effect-TS/effect (effect)

v3.11.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​4113 1c08a0b Thanks @​thewilkybarkid! - Schema: Support template literals in Schema.Config.

  Example

  import { Schema } from "effect"
  
  // const config: Config<`a${string}`>
  const config = Schema.Config(
    "A",
    Schema.TemplateLiteral(Schema.Literal("a"), Schema.String)
  )

• #​4174 1ce703b Thanks @​gcanti! - Schema: Add support for TemplateLiteral parameters in TemplateLiteral, closes #​4166.

  This update also adds support for TemplateLiteral and TemplateLiteralParser parameters in TemplateLiteralParser.

  Before

  import { Schema } from "effect"
  
  const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser(
    "<",
    Schema.TemplateLiteralParser("h", Schema.Literal(1, 2)),
    ">"
  )
  /*
  throws:
  Error: Unsupported template literal span
  schema (TemplateLiteral): `h${"1" | "2"}`
  */

  After

  import { Schema } from "effect"
  
  // Schema<readonly ["<", readonly ["h", 2 | 1], ">"], "<h2>" | "<h1>", never>
  const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser(
    "<",
    Schema.TemplateLiteralParser("h", Schema.Literal(1, 2)),
    ">"
  )
  
  console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("<h1>"))
  // Output: [ '<', [ 'h', 1 ], '>' ]

• #​4174 1ce703b Thanks @​gcanti! - Schema: Fix bug in TemplateLiteralParser where unions of numeric literals were not coerced correctly.

  Before

  import { Schema } from "effect"
  
  const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser("a", Schema.Literal(1, 2))
  
  console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("a1"))
  /*
  throws:
  ParseError: (`a${"1" | "2"}` <-> readonly ["a", 1 | 2])
  └─ Type side transformation failure
     └─ readonly ["a", 1 | 2]
        └─ [1]
           └─ 1 | 2
              ├─ Expected 1, actual "1"
              └─ Expected 2, actual "1"
  */

  After

  import { Schema } from "effect"
  
  const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser("a", Schema.Literal(1, 2))
  
  console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("a1"))
  // Output: [ 'a', 1 ]
  
  console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("a2"))
  // Output: [ 'a', 2 ]
  
  console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("a3"))
  /*
  throws:
  ParseError: (`a${"1" | "2"}` <-> readonly ["a", 1 | 2])
  └─ Encoded side transformation failure
     └─ Expected `a${"1" | "2"}`, actual "a3"
  */

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-16.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$76.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.835 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$85.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$89.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.535 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.53 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.36 \mathrm{s} \pm 539 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$58.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}79.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.892 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.98 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.25 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph