Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update react monorepo #5988

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Update react monorepo #5988

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Dec 21, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@types/react (source) resolutions patch 19.0.1 -> 19.0.8
@types/react (source) devDependencies patch 19.0.1 -> 19.0.8
@types/react-dom (source) devDependencies patch 19.0.2 -> 19.0.3

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge December 21, 2024 12:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps > hash.dev Affects the `hash.dev` developer site (app) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team area/apps area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) labels Dec 21, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Dec 27, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jan 1, 2025
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jan 4, 2025
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jan 26, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.21%. Comparing base (827a1a4) to head (fc1c114).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5988   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.21%   21.21%           
=======================================
  Files         573      573           
  Lines       19658    19658           
  Branches     2870     2870           
=======================================
  Hits         4171     4171           
  Misses      15435    15435           
  Partials       52       52           
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 1.14% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 48.69% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.91% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

CiaranMn
CiaranMn previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 28, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Jan 28, 2025
CiaranMn
CiaranMn previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.82 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.27 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.30 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.89 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.101 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.829 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.740 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$88.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.565 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$83.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.734 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$75.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$91.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 443 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$49.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.238 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$56.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$66.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 25 entities $$84.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.64 \mathrm{s} \pm 288 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.43 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.15 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.94 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Merged via the queue into main with commit 6416a92 Jan 28, 2025
144 checks passed
@CiaranMn CiaranMn deleted the deps/js/react-monorepo branch January 28, 2025 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) area/apps > hash.dev Affects the `hash.dev` developer site (app) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps area/blocks Relates to first-party blocks (area) area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants