Update effect npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@effect/platform (source)	devDependencies	minor	0.71.6 -> 0.72.0
@effect/platform-node (source)	devDependencies	minor	0.67.2 -> 0.68.0
effect (source)	dependencies	minor	3.11.9 -> 3.12.0

---

Release Notes

Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/platform)

v0.72.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​4068 ef64c6f Thanks @​tim-smart! - remove generics from HttpClient tag service

  Instead you can now use HttpClient.With<E, R> to specify the error and
  requirement types.

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [abb22a4, f369a89, 642376c, 3d2b7a7, 73f9c6f, 17cb451, d801820, e1eeb2d, c11f3a6, 618f7e0, c0ba834, e1eeb2d]:
  • effect@3.12.0

v0.71.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [39457d4, a475cc2, 199214e, b3c160d]:
  • effect@3.11.10

Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/platform-node)

v0.68.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [abb22a4, f369a89, 642376c, 3d2b7a7, ef64c6f, 73f9c6f, 17cb451, d801820, e1eeb2d, c11f3a6, 618f7e0, c0ba834, e1eeb2d]:
  • effect@3.12.0
  • @​effect/platform@​0.72.0
  • @​effect/platform-node-shared@​0.22.0

v0.67.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [39457d4, a475cc2, 199214e, b3c160d]:
  • effect@3.11.10
  • @​effect/platform@​0.71.7
  • @​effect/platform-node-shared@​0.21.7

Effect-TS/effect (effect)

v3.12.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​4068 abb22a4 Thanks @​titouancreach! - Added encodeUriComponent/decodeUriComponent for both Encoding and Schema

• #​4068 f369a89 Thanks @​vinassefranche! - Add Runtime.Runtime.Context type extractor

• #​4068 642376c Thanks @​tim-smart! - add non-traced overload to Effect.fn

• #​4068 3d2b7a7 Thanks @​mikearnaldi! - Update fast-check to latest version

• #​4068 73f9c6f Thanks @​wewelll! - add DateTimeUtcFromDate schema

• #​4068 17cb451 Thanks @​fubhy! - Added support for second granularity to Cron.

• #​4068 d801820 Thanks @​fubhy! - Added Cron.unsafeParse and allow passing the Cron.parse time zone parameter as string.

• #​4068 e1eeb2d Thanks @​mikearnaldi! - add Effect.fnUntraced - an untraced version of Effect.fn

• #​4068 c11f3a6 Thanks @​QuentinJanuel! - Add Context.mergeAll to combine multiple Contexts into one.

• #​4068 618f7e0 Thanks @​tim-smart! - add span annotation to disable propagation to the tracer

• #​4068 c0ba834 Thanks @​titouancreach! - Add Schema.headNonEmpty for Schema.NonEmptyArray

Patch Changes

• #​4068 e1eeb2d Thanks @​mikearnaldi! - Carry both call-site and definition site in Effect.fn, auto-trace to anon

v3.11.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​4176 39457d4 Thanks @​mikearnaldi! - Fix Stream.scoped example

• #​4181 a475cc2 Thanks @​gcanti! - Schema: Fix withDecodingDefault implementation to align with its signature (now removes undefined from the AST).

  Additionally, a new constraint has been added to the signature to prevent calling withDecodingDefault after withConstructorDefault, which previously led to the following issue:

  import { Schema } from "effect"
  
  const schema = Schema.Struct({
    a: Schema.optional(Schema.String).pipe(
      Schema.withConstructorDefault(() => undefined), // this is invalidated by the following call to `withDecodingDefault`
      Schema.withDecodingDefault(() => "")
    )
  })

• #​4175 199214e Thanks @​gcanti! - Schema: refactor annotations:

  • Export internal Uint8 schema

  • Export internal NonNegativeInt schema

  • Remove title annotations that are identical to identifiers

  • Avoid setting a title annotation when applying branding

  • Add more title annotations to refinements

  • Improve toString output and provide more precise error messages for refinements:

    Before

    import { Schema } from "effect"
    
    const schema = Schema.Number.pipe(
      Schema.int({ identifier: "MyInt" }),
      Schema.positive()
    )
    
    console.log(String(schema))
    // Output: a positive number
    
    Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)(1.1)
    /*
    throws:
    ParseError: a positive number
    └─ From side refinement failure
      └─ MyInt
          └─ Predicate refinement failure
            └─ Expected MyInt, actual 1.1
    */

    After

    • toString now combines all refinements with " & " instead of showing only the last one.
    • The last message ("Expected ...") now uses the extended description to make the error message clearer.

    import { Schema } from "effect"
    
    const schema = Schema.Number.pipe(
      Schema.int({ identifier: "MyInt" }),
      Schema.positive()
    )
    
    console.log(String(schema))
    // Output: MyInt & positive // <= all the refinements
    
    Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)(1.1)
    /*
    throws:
    ParseError: MyInt & positive
    └─ From side refinement failure
      └─ MyInt
          └─ Predicate refinement failure
            └─ Expected an integer, actual 1.1 // <= extended description
    */

• #​4182 b3c160d Thanks @​mikearnaldi! - Replace absolute imports with relative ones

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.872 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.874 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$95.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 466 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$78.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$90.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$91.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.531 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-94.880 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.70 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$178 \mathrm{ms} \pm 686 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.20 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.26 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$3.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.647 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.49 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.83 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph