Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2025-01-13

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
rust	patch	2025-01-08 -> 2025-01-13

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 11am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.73%. Comparing base (76d9ea5) to head (367da1a).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6141      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   21.72%   21.73%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         566      566              
  Lines       19156    19159       +3     
  Branches     2755     2755              
==========================================
+ Hits         4162     4165       +3     
  Misses      14942    14942              
  Partials       52       52              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.53% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.101 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$69.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 550 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$80.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$88.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$279 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.96 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.86 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$181 \mathrm{ms} \pm 664 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.41 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.933 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.00 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.48 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph