Update npm package @redocly/cli to v1.27.2

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@redocly/cli	devDependencies	patch	1.27.1 -> 1.27.2

---

Release Notes

Redocly/redocly-cli (@​redocly/cli)

v1.27.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated the sideNavStyle configuration schema to include the path-only option.
• Updated @​redocly/openapi-core to v1.27.2.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.73%. Comparing base (6a80058) to head (a1b6901).
Report is 125 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6154      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.73%   21.73%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         566      566              
  Lines       19159    19162       +3     
  Branches     2755     2755              
==========================================
  Hits         4165     4165              
- Misses      14942    14945       +3     
  Partials       52       52              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.868 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$68.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$51.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$75.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$85.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$89.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.31 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.41 \mathrm{s} \pm 543 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.241 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$179 \mathrm{ms} \pm 635 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.534 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.64 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}48.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.74 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph