hduhelp task #20
hduhelp task #20
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a comprehensive set of new functionalities for a web application, including user management, bot interactions, comment handling, dialog management, and post operations. New controllers, models, and data access functions are added to facilitate these features, alongside middleware for JWT authentication and utility functions for file uploads and JWT handling. A Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
🛑 Comments failed to post (80)
hxywd666/models/bot.go (1)
4-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance struct fields with conventions, comments, and tags.
The field definitions are generally good, but consider the following improvements:
- Rename
UserIdtoUserIDto follow Go naming conventions for acronyms.- Add comments to describe the purpose of each field.
- Consider additional GORM tags:
- For
Name: Addgorm:"index"if you plan to query by name frequently.- For
UserID: Addgorm:"foreignkey"if it references a User model.- If you're using a validation library, consider adding appropriate validation tags.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
type Bot struct { ID int64 `gorm:"primary_key"` Name string `gorm:"index"` // The display name of the bot UserID int64 `gorm:"foreignkey"` // The ID of the user who owns this bot Avatar string // URL or path to the bot's avatar image }hxywd666/models/dialog_detail.go (1)
10-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a custom type for the
Typefield.The
Typefield is currently anint. For better type safety and code clarity, consider using a custom type or constants to represent the different types of dialogs.Here's an example of how you could improve this:
type DialogType int const ( DialogTypeNormal DialogType = iota DialogTypeUrgent // Add other types as needed ) type DialogDetail struct { // ... other fields ... Type DialogType // ... remaining fields ... }This approach provides type safety and makes the code more self-documenting.
hxywd666/main/main.go (2)
15-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance server startup with better error handling and configuration.
While the current implementation works, consider the following improvements:
- Use
log.Fatalinstead ofpanicfor server startup errors.- Make the port configurable, possibly through an environment variable.
Here's a suggested improvement:
+ port := os.Getenv("PORT") + if port == "" { + port = "8080" // Default port if not specified + } r := router.Router() - err := r.Run(":8080") - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } + log.Printf("Starting server on port %s", port) + if err := r.Run(":" + port); err != nil { + log.Fatal("Failed to start server:", err) + }This change improves error handling, adds flexibility through environment-based configuration, and provides better logging.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.port := os.Getenv("PORT") if port == "" { port = "8080" // Default port if not specified } r := router.Router() log.Printf("Starting server on port %s", port) if err := r.Run(":" + port); err != nil { log.Fatal("Failed to start server:", err) }
10-13:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and variable naming for database initialization.
Consider the following improvements:
- Rename
isConnecttoerras it stores an error, not a boolean.- Use
log.Fatalfor critical errors like database connection failure.- Consider using English for error messages to improve international compatibility.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- isConnect := dao.InitDB() - if isConnect != nil { - fmt.Println("数据库连接失败") - } + if err := dao.InitDB(); err != nil { + log.Fatal("Failed to connect to the database:", err) + }This change improves error handling, uses idiomatic Go, and provides more informative error messages.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if err := dao.InitDB(); err != nil { log.Fatal("Failed to connect to the database:", err) }hxywd666/models/comment.go (2)
1-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding table name specification and helper functions.
To enhance the functionality and maintainability of the
Commentmodel, consider adding the following:
- A table name specification using GORM's
TableName()method.- A constructor function for creating new
Commentinstances.- Any necessary methods for the
Commentstruct, such as validation or data manipulation.Here's an example of these additions:
// TableName specifies the table name for the Comment model func (Comment) TableName() string { return "comments" } // NewComment creates a new Comment instance func NewComment(content string, userID, postID int64) *Comment { return &Comment{ Content: content, UserID: userID, PostID: postID, CreateTime: time.Now(), Likes: 0, } } // Validate checks if the Comment data is valid func (c *Comment) Validate() error { if c.Content == "" { return errors.New("comment content cannot be empty") } if c.UserID <= 0 { return errors.New("invalid user ID") } if c.PostID <= 0 { return errors.New("invalid post ID") } return nil }These additions will improve the usability and robustness of your
Commentmodel.
5-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Struct definition looks good, but GORM tags could be improved.
The
Commentstruct is well-defined with appropriate fields and types. However, the GORM tags could be enhanced for better clarity and functionality:
- Use
columninstead of directly specifying the column name.- Add
primaryKeytag for theIDfield.- Consider adding
autoIncrementfor theIDfield if it's auto-incrementing.- Add
not nullconstraints where appropriate.- Consider adding
indextags for fields likely to be queried often.Here's an improved version of the struct:
type Comment struct { - ID int64 `gorm:"id"` - Content string `gorm:"content"` - UserID int64 `gorm:"user_id"` - CreateTime time.Time `gorm:"create_time"` - PostID int64 `gorm:"post_id"` - Likes int64 `gorm:"likes"` + ID int64 `gorm:"column:id;primaryKey;autoIncrement"` + Content string `gorm:"column:content;not null"` + UserID int64 `gorm:"column:user_id;not null;index"` + CreateTime time.Time `gorm:"column:create_time;not null"` + PostID int64 `gorm:"column:post_id;not null;index"` + Likes int64 `gorm:"column:likes;default:0"` }These changes will improve the database schema and query performance.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.type Comment struct { ID int64 `gorm:"column:id;primaryKey;autoIncrement"` Content string `gorm:"column:content;not null"` UserID int64 `gorm:"column:user_id;not null;index"` CreateTime time.Time `gorm:"column:create_time;not null"` PostID int64 `gorm:"column:post_id;not null;index"` Likes int64 `gorm:"column:likes;default:0"` }hxywd666/models/user.go (1)
7-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the User struct with additional GORM tags and fields.
The User struct looks good overall, but here are some suggestions for improvement:
- Consider using a more specific type for the
Rolefield, such as an enum or a custom type, to ensure only valid roles are assigned.- Add GORM tags to other fields for better control over database operations. For example:
UsernameandPasswordfield should never be selected by default for security reasons.- Consider adding a
UpdatedAtfield to track when the user record was last modified.- You might want to add validation tags (e.g., from the
validatorpackage) for fields likePhone.Here's an example of how you could enhance the struct:
type User struct { ID int64 `gorm:"primary_key"` Username string `gorm:"unique;not null"` Password string `gorm:"not null" json:"-"` Name string Role UserRole // Define UserRole as a custom type Phone string Email string `gorm:"unique"` RegisterTime time.Time `gorm:"not null"` UpdatedAt time.Time `gorm:"autoUpdateTime"` Avatar string } type UserRole int const ( RoleUser UserRole = iota RoleAdmin RoleModerator )This structure provides better control over database operations and adds an extra field for tracking updates.
hxywd666/dao/database.go (1)
10-18:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity risk: Hardcoded database credentials
The
InitDBfunction correctly initializes the database connection. However, there's a significant security risk:
- The database credentials (username and password) are hardcoded in the DSN string. This is a security vulnerability as it exposes sensitive information in the source code.
To address this, consider the following improvements:
- Use environment variables or a configuration file to store sensitive information.
- Implement a secure method to retrieve and use these credentials at runtime.
Example refactor:
import ( "os" "fmt" ) func InitDB() error { user := os.Getenv("DB_USER") password := os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD") host := os.Getenv("DB_HOST") port := os.Getenv("DB_PORT") dbname := os.Getenv("DB_NAME") dsn := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s@tcp(%s:%s)/%s?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local", user, password, host, port, dbname) db, err := gorm.Open(mysql.Open(dsn), &gorm.Config{}) if err != nil { return err } DB = db return nil }This approach keeps sensitive information out of the source code and allows for easier configuration management across different environments.
hxywd666/dao/bot.go (3)
5-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding input validation
The function directly creates the bot in the database without any validation. Consider adding checks for required fields or any other business rules before persisting the data.
You could add validation like this:
func CreateNewBot(bot *models.Bot) error { if bot == nil { return errors.New("bot cannot be nil") } if bot.Name == "" { return errors.New("bot name cannot be empty") } // Add more validations as needed return DB.Create(bot).Error }
9-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling the "not found" case explicitly
The function doesn't distinguish between a "not found" error and other types of errors. Consider handling this case explicitly to provide more informative error messages.
You could modify the function like this:
import "gorm.io/gorm" func GetBotByID(id int64) (*models.Bot, error) { bot := &models.Bot{} err := DB.Where("id = ?", id).First(bot).Error if err != nil { if err == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound { return nil, fmt.Errorf("bot with id %d not found", id) } return nil, err } return bot, nil }
14-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refining the update logic and adding validation
There are several points to consider in this function:
- It uses
UserIdto locate the bot, which might not be the primary key. Consider using theIDfield instead.- There's no validation of the input
botbefore updating.- The
Savemethod will update all fields, which might not be the intended behavior if you only want to update specific fields.Here's a suggested improvement:
func UpdateBotProfile(bot *models.Bot) error { if bot == nil { return errors.New("bot cannot be nil") } if bot.ID == 0 { return errors.New("bot ID must be provided") } // Add more validations as needed // Only update specific fields return DB.Model(&models.Bot{}).Where("id = ?", bot.ID). Updates(map[string]interface{}{ "name": bot.Name, "description": bot.Description, // Add other fields you want to update }).Error }This approach validates the input, uses the
IDfield to locate the bot, and only updates specific fields.hxywd666/models/post.go (2)
1-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding methods or related types to enhance the
Postmodel.While the
Poststruct is well-defined, consider the following enhancements to make the model more robust and easier to use:
Add a method to validate the post before saving:
func (p *Post) Validate() error { if p.Title == "" { return errors.New("title cannot be empty") } if len(p.Content) < 10 { return errors.New("content must be at least 10 characters long") } return nil }Define a type for post status if applicable:
type PostStatus string const ( PostStatusDraft PostStatus = "draft" PostStatusPublished PostStatus = "published" PostStatusArchived PostStatus = "archived" )Add a method to format the creation time:
func (p *Post) FormattedCreateTime() string { return p.CreateTime.Format("2006-01-02 15:04:05") }These additions would make the
Postmodel more feature-rich and easier to work with in your application.Would you like me to implement any of these suggestions?
5-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the
Poststruct with additional GORM tags and constraints.The
Poststruct is well-defined, but we can improve it by adding more GORM tags for better database mapping and constraints:
- Explicitly define the primary key.
- Add size constraints for
TitleandContent.- Set default values for
ViewsandLikes.- Use
gorm:"column:..."instead of just the column name for clarity.- Add
gorm:"autoUpdateTime"forUpdateTime.Here's an improved version of the struct:
type Post struct { - ID int64 `gorm:"id"` - Title string `gorm:"title"` - Content string `gorm:"content"` - UserID int64 `gorm:"user_id"` - CreateTime time.Time `gorm:"create_time"` - UpdateTime time.Time `gorm:"update_time"` - Views int64 `gorm:"views"` - Likes int64 `gorm:"likes"` + ID int64 `gorm:"column:id;primaryKey;autoIncrement"` + Title string `gorm:"column:title;size:255;not null"` + Content string `gorm:"column:content;type:text"` + UserID int64 `gorm:"column:user_id;not null"` + CreateTime time.Time `gorm:"column:create_time;autoCreateTime"` + UpdateTime time.Time `gorm:"column:update_time;autoUpdateTime"` + Views int64 `gorm:"column:views;default:0"` + Likes int64 `gorm:"column:likes;default:0"` }These changes will:
- Explicitly define
IDas the primary key with auto-increment.- Limit
Titleto 255 characters and make it non-nullable.- Use
texttype forContentto allow for longer posts.- Make
UserIDnon-nullable to ensure each post has an associated user.- Automatically set
CreateTimeandUpdateTime.- Set default values of 0 for
ViewsandLikes.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.type Post struct { ID int64 `gorm:"column:id;primaryKey;autoIncrement"` Title string `gorm:"column:title;size:255;not null"` Content string `gorm:"column:content;type:text"` UserID int64 `gorm:"column:user_id;not null"` CreateTime time.Time `gorm:"column:create_time;autoCreateTime"` UpdateTime time.Time `gorm:"column:update_time;autoUpdateTime"` Views int64 `gorm:"column:views;default:0"` Likes int64 `gorm:"column:likes;default:0"` }hxywd666/README.md (1)
1-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance README with standard sections
To make your README more comprehensive and useful, consider adding the following sections:
- Project Title and Brief Description
- Installation Instructions
- Usage Guide
- API Documentation (if applicable)
- Contributing Guidelines
- License Information
- Contact Information
These additions will make it easier for others to understand, use, and potentially contribute to your project. Also, consider adding an English translation or summary for non-Chinese speakers.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: 动词的修饰一般为‘形容词（副词）+地+动词’。您的意思是否是：基本"地"聊天
Context: ...一些用户账户管理功能，比如修改用户个人信息 还有接入了星火大模型，但只有最基本的聊天功能，勉强……算是接入了一个AI助手 具体功能不在这里细说了，请看代码 ...(wb4)
hxywd666/utils/alioss.go (3)
9-14:
⚠️ Potential issueCritical: OSS client created with empty credentials
The OSS client is currently being initialized with empty strings for the access key ID, access key secret, and endpoint. This is a severe security risk and will cause the upload to fail.
Please update the
oss.New()call with proper credentials and endpoint. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to store these sensitive values.Example:
client, err := oss.New(os.Getenv("OSS_ENDPOINT"), os.Getenv("OSS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"), os.Getenv("OSS_ACCESS_KEY_SECRET"))Also, add a check for empty credentials before attempting to create the client:
if os.Getenv("OSS_ENDPOINT") == "" || os.Getenv("OSS_ACCESS_KEY_ID") == "" || os.Getenv("OSS_ACCESS_KEY_SECRET") == "" { log.Println("OSS credentials are not set") return "" }
15-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve bucket name handling and error reporting
- The bucket name "my-bilibili-project" is hardcoded, which limits the reusability of this function.
- Error handling could be more informative for debugging purposes.
Consider the following improvements:
Make the bucket name a parameter of the function or an environment variable:
bucketName := os.Getenv("OSS_BUCKET_NAME") if bucketName == "" { log.Println("OSS bucket name is not set") return "" } bucket, err := client.Bucket(bucketName)Enhance error reporting:
if err != nil { log.Printf("Failed to upload file %s: %v", objectName, err) return "" }These changes will make the function more flexible and easier to debug.
25-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance URL construction and add input validation
The current implementation has two potential issues:
- It assumes a specific OSS endpoint (oss-cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com).
- There's no validation of the
objectNameparameter.Consider the following improvements:
Use the endpoint from the OSS client configuration:
endpoint := client.Config.Endpoint if !strings.HasPrefix(endpoint, "https://") { endpoint = "https://" + endpoint } return fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s/%s", endpoint, bucketName, objectName)Add input validation for
objectName:if objectName == "" { log.Println("Object name cannot be empty") return "" }These changes will make the function more robust and adaptable to different OSS configurations.
hxywd666/middleware/jwt_middleware.go (3)
11-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a slice for bypass paths.
The current implementation checks for specific paths that bypass authentication. While functional, this approach might become hard to maintain as the number of bypass paths grows.
Consider refactoring to use a slice of bypass paths for better maintainability:
var bypassPaths = []string{"/user/login", "/user/reset", "/user/register"} func JwtTokenUserInterceptor() gin.HandlerFunc { return func(c *gin.Context) { for _, path := range bypassPaths { if c.Request.URL.Path == path { c.Next() return } } // Rest of the middleware logic } }
15-20:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove token parsing and error handling.
The current implementation parses the JWT token but could benefit from more robust error handling and logging.
Consider the following improvements:
- Check if the token is empty before parsing.
- Use a more descriptive error message.
- Log the error for debugging purposes.
Example:
token := c.Request.Header.Get("Authorization") if token == "" { c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"msg": "Missing authorization token"}) c.Abort() return } claims, err := utils.ParseJWT("QASystem", token) if err != nil { // Log the error (implement proper logging) log.Printf("Error parsing JWT: %v", err) c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"msg": "Invalid or expired token"}) c.Abort() return }
21-22:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential type assertion panic.
The current implementation assumes that the "user_id" claim is always present and of type float64. This could lead to a panic if the claim is missing or of an unexpected type.
Implement a safer type assertion:
userId, ok := claims["user_id"].(float64) if !ok { c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"msg": "Invalid user ID in token"}) c.Abort() return } c.Set("user_id", int64(userId))hxywd666/controller/common.go (1)
27-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling: ReturnError function needs adjustment.
The
ReturnErrorfunction is well-structured, but there's a critical issue:
- Using a 200 status code for error responses is not RESTful and may confuse API consumers. Error responses should use appropriate 4xx or 5xx status codes.
Additionally:
2. The function doesn't handle potential errors fromc.JSON().Consider the following improvements:
- Use appropriate HTTP status codes for errors:
func ReturnError(c *gin.Context, httpStatus int, code int, msg interface{}) { json := &JsonErrorStruct{ Code: code, Msg: msg, } c.JSON(httpStatus, json) }
- Handle potential errors from
c.JSON():if err := c.JSON(httpStatus, json); err != nil { // Handle the error, perhaps log it c.AbortWithStatus(http.StatusInternalServerError) }These changes will make the API more RESTful and robust.
hxywd666/dao/user.go (3)
1-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving package structure and error handling
The global
DBobject is not defined in this file. Consider using dependency injection to pass the database connection to these functions, which would improve testability and flexibility.The "fmt" package is only used for a single print statement in the
UpdateUserfunction. In production code, it's generally better to use proper logging instead of print statements.Error handling could be improved by wrapping errors with more context, using a package like
github.com/pkg/errors.Here's an example of how you could refactor the package to use dependency injection:
package dao import ( "QASystem/models" "gorm.io/gorm" ) type UserDAO struct { db *gorm.DB } func NewUserDAO(db *gorm.DB) *UserDAO { return &UserDAO{db: db} } // Then update all functions to be methods of UserDAO, e.g.: // func (u *UserDAO) GetUserByUsername(username string) (*models.User, error) { // ... // }This approach would make the code more testable and flexible.
26-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding validation and returning the created user
The
CreateNewUserfunction is simple and correctly handles the error from the Create operation. However, there are a couple of improvements that could be made:
- Add validation for the user object before insertion.
- Return the created user along with the error to provide the assigned ID.
Here's a suggested improvement:
func CreateNewUser(user *models.User) (*models.User, error) { if user == nil { return nil, errors.New("user cannot be nil") } if user.Username == "" { return nil, errors.New("username cannot be empty") } // Add more validation as needed err := DB.Create(user).Error if err != nil { return nil, err } return user, nil }This version validates the input, creates the user, and returns both the created user (with the assigned ID) and any error that occurred.
31-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueImprove logging, add validation, and consider returning the updated user
The
UpdateUserfunction has a few areas for improvement:
- Replace
fmt.Println(user)with proper logging.- Add validation for the user object before update.
- Consider returning the updated user along with the error.
Here's a suggested improvement:
import "log" func UpdateUser(user *models.User) (*models.User, error) { if user == nil { return nil, errors.New("user cannot be nil") } if user.ID <= 0 { return nil, errors.New("invalid user ID") } // Add more validation as needed log.Printf("Updating user: %+v", user) // Use proper logging err := DB.Model(&models.User{}).Where("id = ?", user.ID).UpdateColumns(user).Error if err != nil { return nil, err } // Fetch the updated user to return updatedUser, err := GetUserByID(user.ID) if err != nil { return nil, err } return updatedUser, nil }This version adds validation, uses proper logging, and returns the updated user along with any error that occurred. It also fetches the updated user after the update to ensure all changes are reflected in the returned object.
hxywd666/utils/verify.go (1)
8-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve function name and error handling
The
ValidatorURLfunction is logically correct, but consider the following improvements:
- Rename the function to follow Go naming conventions, e.g.,
ValidateURLorIsValidURL.- Consider logging or returning the error from
url.Parsefor debugging purposes.- Depending on the use case, you might want to add an optional parameter for allowed schemes.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
func IsValidURL(str string, allowedSchemes ...string) (bool, error) { str = strings.TrimSpace(str) if str == "" { return false, nil } u, err := url.Parse(str) if err != nil { return false, err } if u.Scheme == "" || u.Host == "" { return false, nil } if len(allowedSchemes) > 0 { for _, scheme := range allowedSchemes { if u.Scheme == scheme { return true, nil } } return false, nil } return true, nil }This refactored version allows for specifying allowed schemes and returns any parsing errors.
hxywd666/dao/comment.go (3)
5-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize the database query for counting comments
The current implementation uses
Findfollowed byCount, which is inefficient for just counting records. Consider usingCountdirectly with a more efficient query.Replace the current implementation with:
func CountCommentsByPostID(postID int64) (int64, error) { var count int64 return count, DB.Model(&models.Comment{}).Where("post_id = ?", postID).Count(&count).Error }This change uses
Modelto specify the table and directly counts the matching records without loading them into memory.
10-12:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the parameter passing in CreateComment function
The current implementation passes the address of a pointer to
DB.Create, which is unnecessary and could lead to confusion.Modify the function to pass the pointer directly:
func CreateComment(comment *models.Comment) error { return DB.Create(comment).Error }This change simplifies the code and avoids taking the address of a pointer.
18-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor GetComment function for clarity and maintainability
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- The function name is misleading as it returns multiple comments.
- The
orderByparameter uses magic numbers.- There's duplicate query logic for different ordering options.
Consider the following improvements:
- Rename the function to
GetCommentsto accurately reflect its behavior.- Use an enum or constants for the
orderByparameter.- Refactor the query to reduce duplication.
Here's a suggested implementation:
const ( OrderByTime = iota OrderByLikes ) func GetComments(postID int64, page, pageSize, orderBy int) ([]*models.Comment, error) { var comments []*models.Comment query := DB.Where("post_id = ?", postID).Offset((page - 1) * pageSize).Limit(pageSize) switch orderBy { case OrderByTime: query = query.Order("create_time desc") case OrderByLikes: query = query.Order("likes desc") default: return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid orderBy value: %d", orderBy) } return comments, query.Find(&comments).Error }This refactored version improves readability, reduces duplication, and handles invalid
orderByvalues.hxywd666/dao/post.go (3)
21-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refining the update process.
While the
UpdatePostfunction correctly uses GORM to update a post, there are a few potential improvements:
- Check if the post exists before updating.
- Consider updating only the fields that have changed, rather than all fields.
- Add input validation to ensure the updated data is valid.
Here's a suggested improvement:
func UpdatePost(post *models.Post) error { if err := validatePost(post); err != nil { return err } result := DB.Model(&models.Post{}).Where("id = ?", post.ID).Updates(map[string]interface{}{ "title": post.Title, "content": post.Content, // Add other fields that should be updatable }) if result.Error != nil { return result.Error } if result.RowsAffected == 0 { return errors.New("post not found or no changes made") } return nil }This implementation includes validation, updates only specific fields, and checks if the post exists or if any changes were made.
29-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueRefine the like/unlike logic and add existence check.
The
LikePostfunction uses GORM correctly to modify the like count. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The logic for incrementing/decrementing based on
isLikedseems counterintuitive. IfisLikedis true, it decrements the count, which is opposite of what one might expect.- There's no check to see if the post exists before modifying the like count.
- Consider using a transaction to ensure atomicity of the operation.
Here's a suggested improvement:
func LikePost(postId int64, isLiking bool) error { return DB.Transaction(func(tx *gorm.DB) error { var post models.Post if err := tx.Where("id = ?", postId).First(&post).Error; err != nil { return err } updateExpr := "likes + ?" updateValue := 1 if !isLiking { updateExpr = "likes - ?" updateValue = 1 } result := tx.Model(&post).UpdateColumn("likes", gorm.Expr(updateExpr, updateValue)) if result.Error != nil { return result.Error } if result.RowsAffected == 0 { return errors.New("failed to update like count") } return nil }) }This implementation checks for post existence, uses a more intuitive parameter name (
isLikinginstead ofisLiked), and wraps the operation in a transaction for atomicity.
37-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance pagination logic and add input validation.
The
PagePostfunction implements basic pagination using GORM. However, there are several improvements that can be made:
- Add input validation for
pageNumandpageSize.- Handle the case where there are no posts to return.
- Specify an order for consistent results across pages.
- Consider returning the total count of posts for better pagination UI.
Here's a suggested improvement:
func PagePost(pageNum int, pageSize int) ([]*models.Post, int64, error) { if pageNum < 1 || pageSize < 1 { return nil, 0, errors.New("invalid page number or page size") } var posts []*models.Post var totalCount int64 if err := DB.Model(&models.Post{}).Count(&totalCount).Error; err != nil { return nil, 0, err } if err := DB.Order("created_at DESC"). Limit(pageSize). Offset((pageNum - 1) * pageSize). Find(&posts).Error; err != nil { return nil, 0, err } return posts, totalCount, nil }This implementation includes input validation, orders the results by creation date, and returns the total count of posts along with the paginated results.
hxywd666/go.mod (1)
8-8:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider dependency conflicts and security implications.
Conflicting dependencies:
You have bothgithub.com/gin-gonic/ginandgithub.com/bytedance/soniclisted. While Sonic can be used as a JSON serializer for Gin, make sure you're not unintentionally using both for the same purpose, as this could lead to conflicts or unnecessary code complexity.Security vulnerability:
Thegithub.com/dgrijalva/jwt-gopackage has known security vulnerabilities. Consider replacing it with a more secure alternative such asgithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt.To address these concerns:
- Review your use of Gin and Sonic, ensuring they're used as intended without conflicts.
- Replace the jwt-go library with a secure alternative. You can do this by running:
go get -u github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5Then update your imports and any related code to use the new package.
Also applies to: 12-12, 15-15
hxywd666/dao/dialog.go (4)
25-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent naming for 'userID'
The parameter
userIdshould be renamed touserIDto follow Go naming conventions for initialisms and to maintain consistency throughout the codebase.Apply this diff to rename the parameter and its usage:
-func GetDialogList(userId int64) ([]models.Dialog, error) { +func GetDialogList(userID int64) ([]models.Dialog, error) { var dialogs []models.Dialog - err := DB.Where("user_id = ?", userId).Find(&dialogs).Error + err := DB.Where("user_id = ?", userID).Find(&dialogs).Error return dialogs, err }Also applies to: 27-27
43-44:
⚠️ Potential issueFix pointer usage in 'SaveDialogDetails' function
Passing a pointer to a pointer can lead to unexpected behavior. Since
dialogDetailis already a pointer, you should pass it directly toDB.Save()without taking its address.Apply this diff to correct the pointer usage:
func SaveDialogDetails(dialogDetail *models.DialogDetail) error { - return DB.Save(&dialogDetail).Error + return DB.Save(dialogDetail).Error }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func SaveDialogDetails(dialogDetail *models.DialogDetail) error { return DB.Save(dialogDetail).Error }
1-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error context for better debugging
Currently, errors are returned directly from the database operations. Adding context to errors can greatly aid in debugging by providing more information about where and why an error occurred.
Consider wrapping errors with additional context using
fmt.Errorfor a logging package. For example:func CreateDialog(dialog *models.Dialog) error { - return DB.Create(dialog).Error + if err := DB.Create(dialog).Error; err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to create dialog: %w", err) + } + return nil }Remember to import the
"fmt"package if you choose to usefmt.Errorf.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
25-29: 💡 Codebase verification
Handle 'record not found' errors explicitly
Several instances of
First()andFind()do not explicitly handlegorm.ErrRecordNotFound. This can lead to unhandled scenarios where no records are found.Please update the following files to handle
ErrRecordNotFoundexplicitly:
- hxywd666/dao/post.go
- hxywd666/dao/dialog.go
- hxywd666/dao/user.go
- hxywd666/dao/bot.go
- hxywd666/dao/comment.go
🔗 Analysis chain
Handle 'record not found' errors explicitly
When using
First()orFind(), if no records are found, the error returned could begorm.ErrRecordNotFound. Handling this error explicitly can improve the robustness of your code.Run the following script to check for handling of
ErrRecordNotFound:Consider updating your functions to handle this case:
if err := DB.Where("id = ?", dialogID).First(&dialog).Error; err != nil { if errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound) { // handle record not found } return nil, err }Also applies to: 31-35, 37-41
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of 'First()' and 'Find()' without explicit 'ErrRecordNotFound' handling. # Test: Find occurrences and check for error handling. Expect: Proper handling of 'ErrRecordNotFound'. rg --type go -A 3 'First\(|Find\('Length of output: 2124
hxywd666/utils/spark.go (7)
10-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve readability by defining named types for nested structs.
Using anonymous structs within
SparkRequestcan make the code harder to read and maintain. Defining named types improves clarity and allows for reuse.Define named types for the nested structs:
type Message struct { Role string `json:"role"` Content string `json:"content"` } type SparkRequest struct { Model string `json:"model"` Messages []Message `json:"messages"` Stream bool `json:"stream,omitempty"` }Update the code accordingly where
Messageis used.
19-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve readability by defining named types for nested structs.
Similarly, using named types in
SparkResponseenhances maintainability and allows for better type checking.Define named types for the nested structs:
type ResponseMessage struct { Content string `json:"content"` } type Choice struct { Message ResponseMessage `json:"message"` Delta ResponseMessage `json:"delta"` } type SparkResponse struct { Choices []Choice `json:"choices"` }Update the code accordingly where
ChoiceandResponseMessageare used.
88-90:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle error properly when response does not contain choices.
If
response.Choicesis empty,errmight benil, leading to a confusing error state. It's better to return a clear error message indicating the issue.Consider returning an error indicating that no choices were returned:
} else { - return "", err + return "", errors.New("no choices returned in the response") }Ensure to import the
errorspackage if not already imported.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} else { return "", errors.New("no choices returned in the response") }
31-31:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity Concern: Avoid hardcoding API passwords.
The
apiPasswordis currently hardcoded as an empty string. This could lead to unauthorized access if not handled properly. It's recommended to retrieve sensitive information like API passwords from secure sources such as environment variables or configuration files.Consider retrieving the API password from an environment variable:
-apiPassword := "" +apiPassword := os.Getenv("SPARK_API_PASSWORD") +if apiPassword == "" { + return "", errors.New("API password not set") +}Ensure to import the necessary packages:
import ( "bytes" "encoding/json" "io" "net/http" + "os" + "errors" )Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
60-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Set a timeout for the HTTP client to prevent potential hangs.
Creating an
http.Clientwithout a timeout might cause the request to hang indefinitely if the server doesn't respond promptly.Consider setting a timeout for the HTTP client:
client := &http.Client{ + Timeout: 30 * time.Second, }Ensure to import the
timepackage:import ( "bytes" "encoding/json" "io" "net/http" + "time" )Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
72-74:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure correct error handling when response status is not OK.
When the response status is not
http.StatusOK,errmight benil, which can cause issues if the caller expects an error message. Returning a descriptive error provides better context for debugging.Consider returning an error with a descriptive message:
if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK { - return "", err + return "", fmt.Errorf("unexpected status code: %d, response: %s", resp.StatusCode, string(body)) }Ensure to import the
fmtpackage if not already imported:import ( "bytes" "encoding/json" "io" "net/http" + "fmt" )Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
30-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding a context parameter for enhanced request control.
To allow for request cancellation and timeout control, consider adding a
context.Contextparameter to theSendRequestfunction.Modify the function signature:
-func SendRequest(content, model string) (string, error) { +func SendRequest(ctx context.Context, content, model string) (string, error) {Update the
http.NewRequestcall to use the provided context:-req, err := http.NewRequest("POST", apiUrl+"/chat/completions", bytes.NewBuffer(jsonData)) +req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, "POST", apiUrl+"/chat/completions", bytes.NewBuffer(jsonData))Ensure to import the
contextpackage:import ( "bytes" "encoding/json" "io" "net/http" + "context" )Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
hxywd666/controller/bot.go (7)
16-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Rename
GetBotProfileRequesttoGetBotProfileResponseThe struct
GetBotProfileRequestis being used to construct a response in theGetBotProfilemethod. Renaming it toGetBotProfileResponseimproves code clarity and correctly represents its purpose.Apply this diff:
-type GetBotProfileRequest struct { +type GetBotProfileResponse struct { Name string `json:"name"` Avatar string `json:"avatar"` } ... - res := &GetBotProfileRequest{ + res := &GetBotProfileResponse{ Name: bot.Name, Avatar: bot.Avatar, }Also applies to: 42-45
81-83:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd
returnstatement after error handlingWhen
strconv.ParseIntfails to convertreq.UserId, the function should return after sending the error response to avoid using an invaliduserId.Apply this diff:
if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "服务端异常") + return }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "服务端异常") return }
30-32:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd
returnstatement after error handlingIn the
GetBotProfilemethod, after handling the error fromstrconv.ParseInt, the function should return to prevent further execution with an invalidbotId.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "服务端异常") + return }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "服务端异常") return }
89-93: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Rename variable
isUpdatetoerrfor clarityThe
dao.UpdateBotProfilefunction likely returns an error. Naming the variableisUpdateis misleading. Renaming it toerrmakes it clearer that we're checking for an error.Apply this diff:
-isUpdate := dao.UpdateBotProfile(bot) -if isUpdate != nil { +err := dao.UpdateBotProfile(bot) +if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "更新大模型信息失败") return }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.err := dao.UpdateBotProfile(bot) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "更新大模型信息失败") return }
51-54:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd
returnstatement after error handlingAfter calling
ReturnErrordue to JSON binding error inUpdateBotProfile, the function should return to prevent further execution with invalid input data.Apply this diff:
if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") + return }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&req) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") return }
85-88:
⚠️ Potential issueInclude bot ID when updating the bot profile
The
botstruct being passed todao.UpdateBotProfiledoes not include theIDfield. Without specifying theID, the update operation may not correctly identify which bot to update.Ensure that the
IDfield is set in thebotstruct:bot := &models.Bot{ + ID: botId, // Add this line to set the bot ID Name: req.Name, Avatar: avatar, UserId: userId, }This assumes that
botIdis available in the scope. If not, parse it from the request or include it in theUpdateBotProfileRequest.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
56-95:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure bot profile is updated when avatar is a valid URL
Currently, the
UpdateBotProfilemethod only updates the bot profile when the avatar is not a valid URL (i.e., when it's a base64-encoded image). If the avatar is a valid URL, the bot profile is not updated, which may not be the intended behavior.Consider restructuring the code to update the bot profile regardless of whether the avatar is a valid URL or a base64 string. Here's a suggested refactor:
avatar := req.Avatar -if !utils.ValidatorURL(avatar) { +if !utils.ValidatorURL(avatar) { // Process base64 avatar and upload image // ... avatarURL := utils.UploadFile(imgBytes, file) if avatarURL == "" { ReturnError(c, 0, "图片上传失败") return } avatar = avatarURL } +userId, err := strconv.ParseInt(req.UserId, 10, 64) +if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "服务端异常") + return +} +bot := &models.Bot{ + Name: req.Name, + Avatar: avatar, + UserId: userId, +} +err = dao.UpdateBotProfile(bot) +if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "更新大模型信息失败") + return +} +ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "更新大模型信息成功", nil)This way, the bot profile is updated in both cases, and the avatar URL is correctly set.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.avatar := req.Avatar if !utils.ValidatorURL(avatar) { fileExtension := utils.GetImageExtensionFromBase64(avatar) if fileExtension == "" { ReturnError(c, 0, "头像格式错误") return } fileName, err := uuid.NewRandom() if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "图片上传失败") return } file := fileName.String() + fileExtension base64Avatar := avatar[strings.Index(avatar, ",")+1:] imgBytes, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(base64Avatar) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "图片上传失败") return } avatarURL := utils.UploadFile(imgBytes, file) if avatarURL == "" { ReturnError(c, 0, "图片上传失败") return } avatar = avatarURL } userId, err := strconv.ParseInt(req.UserId, 10, 64) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "服务端异常") return } bot := &models.Bot{ Name: req.Name, Avatar: avatar, UserId: userId, } err = dao.UpdateBotProfile(bot) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "更新大模型信息失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "更新大模型信息成功", nil)hxywd666/controller/comment.go (4)
43-43:
⚠️ Potential issueVerify retrieval of "user_id" from context
When retrieving
user_idusingc.GetInt64("user_id"), if "user_id" is not set, it defaults to0, which might not be a valid user ID. Consider checking whether "user_id" exists in the context before assigning it to the comment.Here's how you might adjust the code:
userID, exists := c.Get("user_id") if !exists { ReturnError(c, 0, "用户未登录") return } comment := &models.Comment{ Content: req.Content, PostID: req.PostID, UserID: userID.(int64), Likes: 0, CreateTime: time.Now(), }
61-65:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd authorization check before deleting comments
In the
DeleteCommentmethod, there's no check to ensure that the user attempting to delete the comment is the owner or has the necessary permissions. This could allow any authenticated user to delete any comment. Consider verifying that theuser_idfrom the context matches theUserIDof the comment before deletion.You might modify the code as follows:
// Fetch the comment to verify ownership comment, err := dao.GetCommentByID(commentID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "评论不存在") return } // Get the user_id from context userID, exists := c.Get("user_id") if !exists { ReturnError(c, 0, "用户未登录") return } // Check if the user is the owner of the comment if comment.UserID != userID.(int64) { ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限删除该评论") return } // Proceed to delete the comment err = dao.DeleteComment(commentID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "删除失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "删除成功", nil)
82-95: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize user data retrieval to reduce database queries
In the loop,
dao.GetUserByID(comment.UserID)is called for each comment, which can lead to performance issues due to multiple database queries (the N+1 query problem). To improve performance, consider modifying thedao.GetCommentmethod to preload user data, fetching comments along with their associated user information in a single query.
25-31:
⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in field name: "CreatTime" should be "CreateTime"
The field name
CreatTimein theGetCommentResponsestruct appears to be a typo. It should be changed toCreateTimefor clarity and consistency.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
type GetCommentResponse struct { Content string `json:"content"` - CreatTime string `json:"create_time"` + CreateTime string `json:"create_time"` Avatar string `json:"avatar"` Name string `json:"name"` Likes int64 `json:"likes"` }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.type GetCommentResponse struct { Content string `json:"content"` CreateTime string `json:"create_time"` Avatar string `json:"avatar"` Name string `json:"name"` Likes int64 `json:"likes"` }hxywd666/controller/post.go (5)
142-154: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for updating views
In the
ViewPostmethod, consider retrieving the post after incrementing the view to confirm the operation was successful and to provide updated data to the client.Optionally, you could modify the method to return the updated view count:
func (p PostController) ViewPost(c *gin.Context) { postId, err := strconv.ParseInt(c.Param("id"), 10, 64) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") return } err = dao.ViewPost(postId) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "浏览失败") return } post, err := dao.GetPostByID(postId) if err != nil || post == nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取帖子失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "浏览成功", map[string]interface{}{"views": post.Views}) }
168-168:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the success message in
LikePostmethodIn line 168, the success message is "服务端异常" (server error), which is misleading when the operation is successful.
Update the success message to accurately reflect the operation's outcome:
- ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "服务端异常", nil) + ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "操作成功", nil)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "操作成功", nil)
98-102:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for errors from
dao.GetUserByIDWhen retrieving the user with
dao.GetUserByID(post.UserID), you check ifpostUser == nilbut not if an error occurred. Iferris notnil, it should be handled to prevent unexpected behavior.Modify the code to handle the error properly:
postUser, err := dao.GetUserByID(post.UserID) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "获取用户信息失败") + return + } if postUser == nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "用户不存在") return }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.postUser, err := dao.GetUserByID(post.UserID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取用户信息失败") return } if postUser == nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "用户不存在") return }
90-97:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle errors returned from
dao.GetPostByIDAfter calling
dao.GetPostByID(postId), you check iferr != niland ifpost == nil. However, if an error occurs, it's important to handle it appropriately. Additionally, ifpostisnilwithout an error, that might indicate that the post doesn't exist.Consider refining the error handling as follows:
post, err := dao.GetPostByID(postId) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取帖子失败") return } - if post == nil { - ReturnError(c, 0, "获取帖子失败") - return - } + if post == nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "帖子不存在") + return + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取帖子失败") return } if post == nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "帖子不存在") return }
55-55:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck if
user_idexists in the contextAt line 55, you retrieve
user_idfrom the context usingc.GetInt64("user_id"). However, this method returns two values: theint64value and a boolean indicating whether the key exists. Ignoring the boolean could lead to unintended consequences ifuser_idis not present in the context, possibly settingUserIDto0.Apply this diff to handle the absence of
user_idproperly:- UserID: c.GetInt64("user_id"), + userID, exists := c.GetInt64("user_id") + if !exists { + ReturnError(c, 0, "用户未登录") + return + } + UserID: userID,Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
hxywd666/controller/dialog.go (9)
67-67:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle errors from
strconv.ParseIntIn several functions, the error returned by
strconv.ParseIntis ignored. This can lead to unexpected behavior or runtime errors if the input is invalid.Please modify the code to handle parsing errors appropriately:
// Example in DeleteDialog func (d DialogController) DeleteDialog(c *gin.Context) { - dialogID, _ := strconv.ParseInt(c.Param("id"), 10, 64) + dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") + dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") + return + } // Rest of the code... } // Apply similar changes to: // - DeleteOneDialogDetail // - GetOneDialog // - GetDialogDetailsAlso applies to: 82-82, 128-128, 143-143
61-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract time format string to a constant
The time format
"2006-01-02 15:04:05"is used repeatedly in the code. To improve maintainability and reduce potential errors, consider defining it as a constant.Define a constant and use it throughout the code:
package controller import ( "QASystem/dao" "QASystem/models" "github.com/gin-gonic/gin" "strconv" "time" ) +const timeFormat = "2006-01-02 15:04:05" // In CreateDialogResponse res := &CreateDialogResponse{ Name: dialog.Name, ID: dialog.ID, - CreateTime: now.Format("2006-01-02 15:04:05"), + CreateTime: now.Format(timeFormat), } // In GetDialogListResponse CreateTime: dialog.CreateTime.Format(timeFormat), // In GetOneDialog CreateTime: oneDialog.CreateTime.Format(timeFormat), // In GetDialogDetailResponse CreateTime: detail.CreateTime.Format(timeFormat), // In SaveDialogDetails - createTime, err := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) + createTime, err := time.Parse(timeFormat, req.CreateTime)Also applies to: 120-120, 137-137, 153-153, 169-169
169-169:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle error from
time.ParseIn
SaveDialogDetails, the error returned bytime.Parsewhen parsingCreateTimeis ignored. This might cause issues if the provided time format is incorrect.Update the code to handle the parsing error:
- createTime, _ := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) + createTime, err := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid create time format") + return + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.createTime, err := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid create time format") return }
81-89:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization check in
DeleteOneDialogDetailThe
DeleteOneDialogDetailfunction deletes a dialog detail by ID but doesn't verify that the detail belongs to the current user. This could allow unauthorized deletion of other users' dialog details.[security]
Please add an authorization check to ensure the dialog detail belongs to the current user:
func (d DialogController) DeleteOneDialogDetail(c *gin.Context) { - dialogDetailID, _ := strconv.ParseInt(c.Param("id"), 10, 64) + dialogDetailIDStr := c.Param("id") + dialogDetailID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogDetailIDStr, 10, 64) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog detail ID") + return + } + userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") + detail, err := dao.GetOneDialogDetail(dialogDetailID) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "对话记录不存在") + return + } + if detail.UserID != userID { + ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限删除该对话记录") + return + } err = dao.DeleteOneDialogDetail(dialogDetailID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "删除对话记录失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "删除对话记录成功", nil) }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
67-79:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization check in
DeleteDialogThe
DeleteDialogfunction deletes a dialog identified bydialogID, but it doesn't verify that the dialog belongs to the current user. This could allow a user to delete dialogs that are not theirs, leading to security issues.[security]
Please add an authorization check to ensure that the dialog belongs to the current user before deleting it. You can modify the function as follows:
func (d DialogController) DeleteDialog(c *gin.Context) { - dialogID, _ := strconv.ParseInt(c.Param("id"), 10, 64) + dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") + dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") + return + } + userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") + dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") + return + } + if dialog.UserID != userID { + ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限删除该对话") + return + } err = dao.DeleteDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "删除对话失败") return } err1 := dao.DeleteDialogDetail(dialogID) if err1 != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "删除对话记录失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "删除对话成功", nil) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (d DialogController) DeleteDialog(c *gin.Context) { dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") return } userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") return } if dialog.UserID != userID { ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限删除该对话") return } err = dao.DeleteDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "删除对话失败") return } err1 := dao.DeleteDialogDetail(dialogID) if err1 != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "删除对话记录失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "删除对话成功", nil) }
91-106:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization check in
EditDialogNameThe
EditDialogNamefunction allows editing a dialog's name but doesn't verify ownership of the dialog. This could permit users to rename dialogs they do not own.[security]
Include an authorization check to confirm the dialog belongs to the current user:
func (d DialogController) EditDialogName(c *gin.Context) { var req EditDialogNameRequest err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&req) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") return } dialogID := req.ID newName := req.Name + userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") + dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") + return + } + if dialog.UserID != userID { + ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限修改该对话名称") + return + } err = dao.EditDialogName(dialogID, newName) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "修改对话名称失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "修改对话名称成功", nil) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (d DialogController) EditDialogName(c *gin.Context) { var req EditDialogNameRequest err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&req) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") return } dialogID := req.ID newName := req.Name userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") return } if dialog.UserID != userID { ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限修改该对话名称") return } err = dao.EditDialogName(dialogID, newName) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "修改对话名称失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "修改对话名称成功", nil) }
127-140:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization check in
GetOneDialogThe
GetOneDialogfunction retrieves a dialog without verifying if it belongs to the current user, potentially exposing sensitive information.[security]
Add an authorization check to ensure the dialog owner matches the current user:
func (d DialogController) GetOneDialog(c *gin.Context) { - dialogID, _ := strconv.ParseInt(c.Param("id"), 10, 64) + dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") + dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") + return + } oneDialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取对话失败") return } + userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") + if oneDialog.UserID != userID { + ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限查看该对话") + return + } res := &GetDialogListResponse{ ID: oneDialog.ID, Name: oneDialog.Name, CreateTime: oneDialog.CreateTime.Format("2006-01-02 15:04:05"), } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "获取对话成功", res) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (d DialogController) GetOneDialog(c *gin.Context) { dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") return } oneDialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取对话失败") return } userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") if oneDialog.UserID != userID { ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限查看该对话") return } res := &GetDialogListResponse{ ID: oneDialog.ID, Name: oneDialog.Name, CreateTime: oneDialog.CreateTime.Format("2006-01-02 15:04:05"), } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "获取对话成功", res) }
142-160:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization check in
GetDialogDetailsThe
GetDialogDetailsfunction fetches dialog details without confirming the dialog's ownership, risking unauthorized data exposure.[security]
Implement an authorization check to verify the dialog belongs to the current user:
func (d DialogController) GetDialogDetails(c *gin.Context) { - dialogID, _ := strconv.ParseInt(c.Param("id"), 10, 64) + dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") + dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") + return + } + userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") + dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") + return + } + if dialog.UserID != userID { + ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限查看该对话内容") + return + } dialogDetails, err := dao.GetDialogDetails(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取对话内容失败") return } var res []GetDialogDetailResponse for _, detail := range dialogDetails { item := GetDialogDetailResponse{ Content: detail.Content, CreateTime: detail.CreateTime.Format("2006-01-02 15:04:05"), Type: detail.Type, ID: detail.ID, } res = append(res, item) } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "获取对话内容成功", res) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (d DialogController) GetDialogDetails(c *gin.Context) { dialogIDStr := c.Param("id") dialogID, err := strconv.ParseInt(dialogIDStr, 10, 64) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid dialog ID") return } userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") return } if dialog.UserID != userID { ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限查看该对话内容") return } dialogDetails, err := dao.GetDialogDetails(dialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "获取对话内容失败") return } var res []GetDialogDetailResponse for _, detail := range dialogDetails { item := GetDialogDetailResponse{ Content: detail.Content, CreateTime: detail.CreateTime.Format("2006-01-02 15:04:05"), Type: detail.Type, ID: detail.ID, } res = append(res, item) } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "获取对话内容成功", res) }
162-183:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization check in
SaveDialogDetailsThe
SaveDialogDetailsfunction saves dialog details without verifying if the dialog belongs to the current user, potentially allowing unauthorized data manipulation.[security]
Add an authorization check before saving the dialog details:
func (d DialogController) SaveDialogDetails(c *gin.Context) { var req SaveDialogRequest err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&req) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") return } + userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") + dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(req.DialogID) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") + return + } + if dialog.UserID != userID { + ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限保存对话内容") + return + } - createTime, _ := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) + createTime, err := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) + if err != nil { + ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid create time format") + return + } dialogDetail := &models.DialogDetail{ - UserID: c.GetInt64("user_id"), + UserID: userID, Type: req.Type, Content: req.Content, CreateTime: createTime, DialogID: req.DialogID, } err = dao.SaveDialogDetails(dialogDetail) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "保存对话内容失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "保存对话内容成功", nil) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (d DialogController) SaveDialogDetails(c *gin.Context) { var req SaveDialogRequest err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&req) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "参数错误") return } userID := c.GetInt64("user_id") dialog, err := dao.GetOneDialog(req.DialogID) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "对话不存在") return } if dialog.UserID != userID { ReturnError(c, 0, "无权限保存对话内容") return } createTime, err := time.Parse("2006-01-02 15:04:05", req.CreateTime) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "Invalid create time format") return } dialogDetail := &models.DialogDetail{ UserID: userID, Type: req.Type, Content: req.Content, CreateTime: createTime, DialogID: req.DialogID, } err = dao.SaveDialogDetails(dialogDetail) if err != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "保存对话内容失败") return } ReturnSuccess(c, 1, "保存对话内容成功", nil) }hxywd666/controller/user.go (6)
186-244: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor
UpdateUserProfileto reduce code duplicationThe
UpdateUserProfilemethod contains duplicated code for updating the user profile in both theifblock (lines 192-229) and after it (lines 230-244). This redundancy can be reduced by consolidating the update logic.Consider restructuring the code as follows:
- Process the avatar and update it if necessary.
- Construct the
userobject once.- Call
dao.UpdateUser(user)and handle the response.- Return the success or error message.
By doing so, you enhance maintainability and readability.
125-126:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure correct user ID when creating a bot
In the
Registermethod, theUserIdfor the new bot is obtained usingc.GetInt64("user_id"). Since this is during registration, theuser_idmay not be set in the context, leading to an incorrect association.Apply this diff to use the newly created user's ID:
bot := &models.Bot{ Name: "星火大模型", Avatar: "https://my-bilibili-project.oss-cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/spark_logo.png", - UserId: c.GetInt64("user_id"), + UserId: user.ID, }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.UserId: user.ID, }
151-152:
⚠️ Potential issueHash passwords when updating them
When resetting the password, the new password should be hashed before storing it in the database to maintain security.
Apply this diff:
- user.Password = req.NewPassword + user.Password = utils.HashPassword(req.NewPassword)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.user.Password = utils.HashPassword(req.NewPassword) isUpdated := dao.UpdateUser(user)
217-227:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure proper authorization when updating user profiles
When updating user information, the
IDis taken from the request body (req.ID). This could allow a user to update another user's profile by specifying a differentID. Implement authentication checks to ensure that users can only update their own profiles.Apply this diff to use the authenticated user's ID:
user := &models.User{ - ID: req.ID, + ID: c.GetInt64("user_id"), Avatar: url, Name: req.Name, Phone: req.Phone, Email: req.Email, }Ensure that
c.GetInt64("user_id")retrieves the ID of the authenticated user from the context.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ID: c.GetInt64("user_id"), Avatar: url, Name: req.Name, Phone: req.Phone, Email: req.Email, } isUpdate := dao.UpdateUser(user) if isUpdate != nil { ReturnError(c, 0, "更新用户信息失败") return }
110-116:
⚠️ Potential issueHash passwords before storing them
Storing passwords in plaintext is a severe security vulnerability. Use a secure hashing function to hash passwords before saving them to the database.
Apply this diff:
user = &models.User{ Username: req.Username, - Password: req.Password, + Password: utils.HashPassword(req.Password), Name: req.Username, Avatar: "https://cube.elemecdn.com/3/7c/3ea6beec64369c2642b92c6726f1epng.png", Role: 0, }Ensure you have a function
HashPasswordin yourutilspackage that securely hashes the password.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
73-75:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement secure password hashing
Comparing plaintext passwords is insecure and poses a significant security risk. Passwords should be hashed using a strong hashing algorithm (e.g., bcrypt) before storing in the database. During authentication, compare the hashed password from the database with the hash of the provided password.
Apply these diffs:
In the password comparison:
- if user.Password != req.Password { + if !utils.CheckPasswordHash(req.Password, user.Password) {Ensure you have a function
CheckPasswordHashin yourutilspackage that compares the hashed password.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
hxywd666/router/route.go (6)
26-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use
PUTmethod for updating bot profiles instead ofPOSTThe endpoint
/profileis handling bot profile updates using thePOSTmethod. According to RESTful conventions, updating existing resources should use thePUTorPATCHmethods.Apply this diff to change the method from
POSTtoPUT:-bot.POST("/profile", controller.BotController{}.UpdateBotProfile) +bot.PUT("/profile", controller.BotController{}.UpdateBotProfile)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.bot.PUT("/profile", controller.BotController{}.UpdateBotProfile)
20-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use
PUTmethod for updating user profiles instead ofPOSTThe endpoint
/profileis handling profile updates using thePOSTmethod. In RESTful API design, updates to existing resources should use thePUTorPATCHmethods.Apply this diff to change the method from
POSTtoPUT:-user.POST("/profile", controller.UserController{}.UpdateUserProfile) +user.PUT("/profile", controller.UserController{}.UpdateUserProfile)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.user.PUT("/profile", controller.UserController{}.UpdateUserProfile)
59-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Modify comment routes for RESTful consistency
The comment routes can be refined to better align with RESTful API design.
Apply these changes:
-comment.PUT("/", controller.CommentController{}.CreateComment) -comment.DELETE("/:id", controller.CommentController{}.DeleteComment) -comment.GET("/", controller.CommentController{}.GetComment) +comment.POST("/", controller.CommentController{}.CreateComment) +comment.GET("/:id", controller.CommentController{}.GetComment) +comment.DELETE("/:id", controller.CommentController{}.DeleteComment)Updates:
- Use
POST /comment/to create a new comment.- Use
GET /comment/:idto retrieve a specific comment.- Use
DELETE /comment/:idto delete a comment.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.comment.POST("/", controller.CommentController{}.CreateComment) comment.GET("/:id", controller.CommentController{}.GetComment) comment.DELETE("/:id", controller.CommentController{}.DeleteComment)
31-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor dialog routes to follow RESTful API principles
The dialog routes use custom endpoints like
/add,/delete/:id, and/edit. For consistency and clarity, it's recommended to use standard RESTful conventions.Consider updating the routes as follows:
-dialog.POST("/add", controller.DialogController{}.CreateDialog) -dialog.DELETE("/delete/:id", controller.DialogController{}.DeleteDialog) -dialog.DELETE("/deleteone/:id", controller.DialogController{}.DeleteOneDialogDetail) -dialog.POST("/edit", controller.DialogController{}.EditDialogName) -dialog.GET("/list", controller.DialogController{}.GetDialogList) -dialog.GET("/one/:id", controller.DialogController{}.GetOneDialog) -dialog.GET("/details/:id", controller.DialogController{}.GetDialogDetails) -dialog.POST("/details", controller.DialogController{}.SaveDialogDetails) +dialog.POST("/", controller.DialogController{}.CreateDialog) +dialog.DELETE("/:id", controller.DialogController{}.DeleteDialog) +dialog.DELETE("/detail/:id", controller.DialogController{}.DeleteOneDialogDetail) +dialog.PUT("/:id", controller.DialogController{}.EditDialogName) +dialog.GET("/", controller.DialogController{}.GetDialogList) +dialog.GET("/:id", controller.DialogController{}.GetOneDialog) +dialog.GET("/:id/details", controller.DialogController{}.GetDialogDetails) +dialog.POST("/:id/details", controller.DialogController{}.SaveDialogDetails)This aligns the routes with RESTful standards:
POST /dialog/to create a new dialog.DELETE /dialog/:idto delete a dialog.PUT /dialog/:idto edit a dialog.GET /dialog/to get a list of dialogs.GET /dialog/:idto get a specific dialog.GET /dialog/:id/detailsto get dialog details.POST /dialog/:id/detailsto save dialog details.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.dialog.POST("/", controller.DialogController{}.CreateDialog) dialog.DELETE("/:id", controller.DialogController{}.DeleteDialog) dialog.DELETE("/detail/:id", controller.DialogController{}.DeleteOneDialogDetail) dialog.PUT("/:id", controller.DialogController{}.EditDialogName) dialog.GET("/", controller.DialogController{}.GetDialogList) dialog.GET("/:id", controller.DialogController{}.GetOneDialog) dialog.GET("/:id/details", controller.DialogController{}.GetDialogDetails) dialog.POST("/:id/details", controller.DialogController{}.SaveDialogDetails)
48-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Adjust post routes to adhere to RESTful conventions
The post routes use methods and endpoints that are inconsistent with standard RESTful practices.
Suggested updates:
-post.PUT("/", controller.PostController{}.CreatePost) -post.DELETE("/:id", controller.PostController{}.DeletePost) -post.GET("/:id", controller.PostController{}.GetPost) -post.POST("/update", controller.PostController{}.UpdatePost) -post.POST("/view/:id", controller.PostController{}.ViewPost) -post.POST("/like", controller.PostController{}.LikePost) -post.GET("/list", controller.PostController{}.PagePost) +post.POST("/", controller.PostController{}.CreatePost) +post.GET("/", controller.PostController{}.PagePost) +post.GET("/:id", controller.PostController{}.GetPost) +post.PUT("/:id", controller.PostController{}.UpdatePost) +post.DELETE("/:id", controller.PostController{}.DeletePost) +post.POST("/:id/view", controller.PostController{}.ViewPost) +post.POST("/:id/like", controller.PostController{}.LikePost)Changes explained:
- Use
POST /post/to create a new post.- Use
GET /post/for listing posts (with pagination).- Use
GET /post/:idto retrieve a specific post.- Use
PUT /post/:idto update a post.- Use
DELETE /post/:idto delete a post.- Use
POST /post/:id/viewto increment view count.- Use
POST /post/:id/liketo like a post.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.post.POST("/", controller.PostController{}.CreatePost) post.GET("/", controller.PostController{}.PagePost) post.GET("/:id", controller.PostController{}.GetPost) post.PUT("/:id", controller.PostController{}.UpdatePost) post.DELETE("/:id", controller.PostController{}.DeletePost) post.POST("/:id/view", controller.PostController{}.ViewPost) post.POST("/:id/like", controller.PostController{}.LikePost)
12-12:
⚠️ Potential issueMiddleware placement may affect public endpoints
The
JwtTokenUserInterceptormiddleware is applied globally, which may restrict access to public endpoints like user registration and login.If the intention is to allow unauthenticated access to certain endpoints (e.g.,
/user/login,/user/register), consider adjusting the middleware placement:-r.Use(middleware.JwtTokenUserInterceptor()) +authRequired := r.Group("/") +authRequired.Use(middleware.JwtTokenUserInterceptor()) +{ + // Protected routes go here +}Then, place protected routes inside the
authRequiredgroup and keep public routes outside of it.Alternatively, you can exclude specific routes from the middleware.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
23050724的PR
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes