-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get rid of the worker_type option #199
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #199 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.54% 92.54%
=======================================
Files 10 10
Lines 456 456
=======================================
Hits 422 422
Misses 34 34 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be Ok. I don't see any more references to worker_type
in the code, either.
I'm not sure why tests fail after merging this branch with |
I've seen |
We're not planning to implement support for anything other than gen_servers any time soon.
5337c05
to
1a7f23f
Compare
There, just a retry and this is green, we've got a flaky test @elbrujohalcon 🤷🏽 |
|
We're not planning to implement support for anything other than gen_servers any time soon.
Tackles #194.