Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get rid of the worker_type option #199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

NelsonVides
Copy link
Collaborator

We're not planning to implement support for anything other than gen_servers any time soon.

Tackles #194.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9ddf1aa) 92.54% compared to head (1a7f23f) 92.54%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #199   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.54%   92.54%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         456      456           
=======================================
  Hits          422      422           
  Misses         34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@NelsonVides NelsonVides linked an issue Dec 16, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Collaborator

@paulo-ferraz-oliveira paulo-ferraz-oliveira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be Ok. I don't see any more references to worker_type in the code, either.

@elbrujohalcon
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure why tests fail after merging this branch with main. @NelsonVides can you check?

@NelsonVides
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm not sure why tests fail after merging this branch with main. @NelsonVides can you check?

I've seen mess_up_with_store being flaky in other PRs, sometimes passing and sometimes failing... 🤔

We're not planning to implement support for anything other than gen_servers
any time soon.
@NelsonVides NelsonVides force-pushed the get_rid_of_worker_type branch from 5337c05 to 1a7f23f Compare December 19, 2023 08:40
@NelsonVides
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There, just a retry and this is green, we've got a flaky test @elbrujohalcon 🤷🏽

@elbrujohalcon
Copy link
Member

There, just a retry and this is green, we've got a flaky test @elbrujohalcon 🤷🏽

@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon reopened this Dec 19, 2023
@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2023
@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon merged commit d8573c2 into inaka:main Dec 19, 2023
4 of 6 checks passed
@NelsonVides NelsonVides deleted the get_rid_of_worker_type branch December 19, 2023 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove worker_type
3 participants