-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
712 - {shinytest2}
for tm_a_regression
#718
Conversation
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: 76558fd Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Unit Test Performance Difference
Additional test case details
Results for commit 56a0010 ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: Marcin <133694481+m7pr@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: André Veríssimo <211358+averissimo@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Marcin <133694481+m7pr@users.noreply.github.com>
…sengineering/teal.modules.general into 712-tm_a_regression@main
@averissimo this is weird, since this was no longer the case when I added |
Yeah, been there and got surprised when @vedhav pointed it to me that it wasn't working out of the box. Unfortunately, |
{shinytest2}
for tm_a_regerssion
{shinytest2}
for tm_a_regression
Unit Tests Summary 1 files 13 suites 4m 11s ⏱️ Results for commit 76558fd. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
@gogonzo regarding
During reifnement on Thursday we decided to focus on whether options can be checked, selected and changed. We did agree we want to test the output change only for tables. For plots we decided it is too complicated right now to verify changes on the plots. |
Fair enough |
Hey @gogonzo would you mind another look? I think I applied most of the comments and advices. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this is enough if we don't test the output yet
Co-authored-by: André Veríssimo <211358+averissimo@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Marcin <133694481+m7pr@users.noreply.github.com>
…sengineering/teal.modules.general into 712-tm_a_regression@main
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this PR test for validation errors are missing. There are couple of validate
in the srv_a_regression
and none of them are tested. Same applies to other PRs in the issue. I will not block this PR, this can be done iteratively.
Part of #712