Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uv17pro: Fix exposing static banks on some models #1226

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

kk7ds
Copy link
Owner

@kk7ds kk7ds commented Jan 13, 2025

Previously in commit:5d295a8b we added a static bank model to show
the static mappings between memories and "banks" in these radios.
However, only some of the more advanced models have this functionality,
not all the radios that inherit from UV17Pro. This fixes that to only
apply this model to the UV17ProGPS and BF-F8HP-PRO models.

Further, in commit:d1f8504e we fixed the bug where the UV17 models
inherited this behavior to disable it for them. Those overrides are
no longer necessary, so this removes them.

Related to #11642

Previously in commit:5d295a8b we added a static bank model to show
the static mappings between memories and "banks" in these radios.
However, only some of the more advanced models have this functionality,
not all the radios that inherit from UV17Pro. This fixes that to only
apply this model to the UV17ProGPS and BF-F8HP-PRO models.

Further, in commit:d1f8504e we fixed the bug where the UV17 models
inherited this behavior to disable it for them. Those overrides are
no longer necessary, so this removes them.

Related to #11642
@kk7ds kk7ds force-pushed the fix-uv17-static-banks branch from 662c280 to 4e91812 Compare January 13, 2025 02:20
@kk7ds
Copy link
Owner Author

kk7ds commented Jan 13, 2025

Okay @KC9HI I think this cleans up my mess.

@KC9HI
Copy link
Contributor

KC9HI commented Jan 13, 2025

Yes @kk7ds I think this is what was needed. Thanks!

@kk7ds kk7ds merged commit fc94f14 into master Jan 13, 2025
6 checks passed
@kk7ds kk7ds deleted the fix-uv17-static-banks branch January 13, 2025 03:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants