Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docs and examples for 9.0.0 #239

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ocadaruma
Copy link
Contributor

@ocadaruma ocadaruma requested a review from kawamuray August 14, 2024 02:51
But Decaton has the capability to consume arbitrary topics other than topics consisting records of Decaton protocol.
[NOTE]
====
* From Decaton 9.0.0, DecatonClient no longer wraps tasks with DecatonTaskRequest protobuf message.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, maybe we can emphasize that most users has no motivation to refer this doc anymore unless they want to do something very niche in the first line of this document, with bold letters.
I know it's written below but my point is not as one of these listings but as the headline of the document.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I recalled that we still need to use TaskExtractor for arbitrary topic which is not produced by DecatonClient, because ProcessorsBuilder.consuming(String topic, Deserializer<T> deserializer) assumes task is serialized as DecatonTaskRequest when dt_meta header is absent.

@ocadaruma ocadaruma requested a review from kawamuray August 14, 2024 04:14
@kawamuray kawamuray merged commit e0f6dc9 into line:master Aug 14, 2024
5 checks passed
@ocadaruma ocadaruma deleted the update-doc branch August 14, 2024 06:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants