-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing floating button style horizontal padding #2113
Open
daceball
wants to merge
2
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
daceball:daceball/floatingButtonStyle
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you check to see how this affects FAB controls with text? IIRC this alternate padding was used to ensure that buttons with text had the right amount of padding, which was slightly higher on the trailing edge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure! In the Figma the trailing and leading padding have same values.
This is how the FAB with text looks after the update I made. Please let me know if it looks good and if there are other scenarios I should test. Thanks! (:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mischreiber Could you confirm if the FAB with text example I added above looks correct? thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's something odd going on -- look at how much space there is between the right edge of the word
Label
and the actual bounding box that's being calculated. I'm investigating what's going on there now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed: there appears to be a 4pt spacing between the actual label's bounding box, and the box being measured against.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a way we can figure out where those extra 4pts of spacing are coming from? Feels like a slightly painful API if users have to duplicate information of whether it has a label to us?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's definitely an intentional design decision. The component looks unbalanced without the extra padding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mischreiber Thank you for confirming that this is by design. Could you please let me know if you agree with the fix I made by adding the
isIconOnly
parameter to the style init:FluentButtonStyle(style: .floatingSubtle, isIconOnly: true)
? ThanksThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daceball is there a way to internally determine if it's an iconOnly/textOnly button, I agree with Anand that this is a slightly painful api then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mischreiber Looks like
ButtonStyle
doesn’t have a built-in way to figure out if a button is icon-only or icon+text. InmakeBody(configuration:)
, theconfiguration.label
is just aView
, so the style doesn’t get any extra info about whether there’s text or just an icon. We’d have to pass this info as a parameter (like in my last commit). I can think of the following approaches:style: .floatingSubtleIconOnly
) and pick the right padding for each type.Let me know what you think about these options or if you have another idea to solve this bug. I'd really appreciate your input!