Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Yarn to v4 #807

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update Yarn to v4 #807

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

smorimoto
Copy link
Contributor

@smorimoto smorimoto commented Oct 31, 2023

At the moment, multiple versions of yarn can be mixed, so it's quite tricky to develop. So in this PR use corepack to make it possible to use yarn v4 without much effort. All you or the CI machine need to do is execute corepack enable.

Signed-off-by: Sora Morimoto <sora@morimoto.io>
@smorimoto smorimoto requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2023 15:13
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 31, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
elements-demo-create-react-app ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 31, 2023 3:17pm
elements-demo-nextjs ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 31, 2023 3:17pm
elements-demo-svelte-kit ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 31, 2023 3:17pm
elements-demo-vanilla ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 31, 2023 3:17pm
elements-demo-vue ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 31, 2023 3:17pm

@luwes
Copy link
Contributor

luwes commented Dec 4, 2023

@smorimoto thanks for the contributions! we discussed this internally briefly and we're going to stick with yarn v1 for the time being as it doesn't give any huge benefits and it has the potential to lead to other things breaking.

personally I haven't seen much adoption of corepack. is this being used more and more in open source?

@luwes luwes closed this Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants