Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(pipeline-sync): Removes requirement to have authors defined #3393

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

adamrtalbot
Copy link
Contributor

@adamrtalbot adamrtalbot commented Jan 13, 2025

If authors were missing the pipelines sync failed with a meaningless error. This wastes developer time while users have to fight configuration. Since authors are easy to maintain manually it seems silly to break the pipeline sync just for on field, so this PR makes it optional, it is encouraged by the .nf-core.yml and existing template.

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason)
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • Documentation in docs is updated

adamrtalbot and others added 2 commits January 13, 2025 12:05
If authors were missing the pipelines sync failed with a meaningless error. This wastes developer time while users have to fight configuration. Since authors are easy to maintain manually it seems silly to break the pipeline sync just for on field, so this PR makes it optional, it is encouraged by the .nf-core.yml and existing template.
@mashehu
Copy link
Contributor

mashehu commented Jan 13, 2025

@nf-core-bot fix linting

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mashehu
Copy link
Contributor

mashehu commented Jan 13, 2025

Did you test this doesn't break things like RO-crate?

Copy link
Member

@mirpedrol mirpedrol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have added the try/except back, the current changes LGTM 🙂
It still doesn't solve #3373 but I will work on this on a separate PR
Thanks for this fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants