-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trio reverts to looking for old G7 CGM and misses readings #354
Comments
I don’t have any screenshots but we’ve also experienced this issue. |
Great finds! It sounds like the plist is correctly updated when adding (or re-adding) the CGM “as new” but not when a new CGM is “auto detected”. One fix is to of course write to the plist on every connection, but this is IO heavy. We could also read from the plist and if the sensor ID doesn’t match, then update plist (also expensive to read from plist every cycle, assuming we aren’t already doing this (? have not looked). Do we have any natural hooks to identify that a new sensor is being read, to then trigger the plist update so we can avoid that IO if possible? Of course if it’s already required this is a moot concern :) |
That is very good news as it means we're more empowered to fix this directly I think. |
I agree @aug0211 . Dan and I are troubleshooting now and will try to apply a fix. But we have to coordinate testing to avoid wasting sensors :) |
Fixed via #376 - closing issue. |
Describe the bug
Trio reverts to a prior G7 sensor seemingly at random. The current sensor is not seen and BG readings are dropped. Missed readings, yellow loops and red loops may occur. This normally self heals after a handful of missed readings.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
Trio should pull BG readings from the actively paired sensor.
Screenshots
Setup Information (please complete the following information):
Smartphone:
Pump:
CGM:
Additional context
A number of uses have anecdotally reported more missed readings with Trio than expected. Perhaps this is the cause.
Light discussion on this in Discord chat with 3 people experiencing and discussing this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: