-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement GNU jobserver posix client support #2474
Open
mcprat
wants to merge
1
commit into
ninja-build:master
Choose a base branch
from
mcprat:jobserver-final
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+376
−44
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Document what it means for
jobserver_
to be NULL.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's never NULL when running the real
ninja
, only for theninja_test
binaryThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Add as a comment:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To make the code easier to follow, I recommend to instead make JobServer a base class that does nothing (never enabled), then add a derived PosixJobServer class. This will allow you to add a Win32JobServer class later, and remove the need for all the
#ifdef _WIN32
section sprinkled over the code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@digit-google I understand class inheritance can work, but in this case I think I would have to fill the base class with no-op functions to get rid of the preprocessor stuff. Would that not be equally ugly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you would need no-op methods for the base class, but this leads to code that is easier to read and maintain over time. You can have test-specific implementations if you want as well. Since this class is not performance critical, you can do something like that:
Add an
std::unique_ptr<Jobserver> jobserver_
member to this class, and default-initialize it with a base/null instance that does nothing. This avoids modifying tests that don't care about the feature at all.Add a
SetJobserver(std::unique_ptr<Jobserver> jobserver)
method to replace the instance's jobserver with a new value. This can be called after constructing a Builder instance where it is needed only. This passes ownership to avoid lifecycle management issues.The rest of the code here can use
jobserver_->xxxx()
without worrying about the rest.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I split the class into a basic pair of base and derived classes, now it is down to one
#ifdef _WIN32
. The rest of these tips revolving aroundunique_ptr
is a little advanced for me, so I'm pushing what I have and we can take some more time to figure out that bit and how useful it would be.