Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix release v1.2.1 #126

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 14, 2020
Merged

Bugfix release v1.2.1 #126

merged 12 commits into from
Dec 14, 2020

Conversation

jlconlin
Copy link
Member

@jlconlin jlconlin commented Nov 2, 2020

@jlconlin jlconlin changed the title Release/v1.2.1 Bugfix release v1.2.1 Nov 2, 2020
CMakeLists.txt Outdated
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ option( strict_compile
# Compile flags
set( common_flags "-Wall" "-Wextra" "-Wpedantic" )
set( strict_flags "-Werror" )
set( release_flags "-O3" )
set( release_flags "-O3" "-Wno-unknown-warning-option" )
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nathangibson14 I'm not sure this is the right way to address #106 and #116. It solves the problem, but it may just be a cop-out.

@jlconlin jlconlin marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2020 23:33
@jlconlin
Copy link
Member Author

@whaeck and @nathangibson14 Could you take a look at this Pull Request, please?

@jlconlin
Copy link
Member Author

jlconlin commented Dec 1, 2020

Last chance to make a statement about this Pull Request. I've been waiting a month with no response. Please help out.

@@ -18,7 +18,11 @@
#include "Log.hpp"
#include "utility.hpp"


#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmaybe-uninitialized"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might it be possible to tweak the offending lipservice code so that this isn't necessary? (I suppose I could go take a look myself.) Better a fundamental fix than diagnostic push/pop pragmas everywhere else that uses it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you saw in #106, the lipservice code is valid and initialized. I do think think this is a GCC bug.

@whaeck
Copy link
Member

whaeck commented Dec 2, 2020

@jlconlin The CI seems to indicate a linker problem for gcc9. Did you look into that?

@jlconlin
Copy link
Member Author

jlconlin commented Dec 2, 2020

@jlconlin The CI seems to indicate a linker problem for gcc9. Did you look into that?

I saw that there was a problem. I haven't been able to reproduce it on my own Mac.

@jlconlin jlconlin merged commit 84d6f4f into master Dec 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants