-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remediation categories #807
Remediation categories #807
Conversation
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#563 - add value "optional_patch" - adapt prose
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#563 - add conversion rule for CVRF - add conversion rule from CSAF 2.0
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#662 - add value `fix_planned` as remediation category - adapt prose - restructure mutually exclusive categories
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#662 - add conversion rule from CVRF - add conversion rule from CSAF 2.0 - fix format mistake
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - clarify that reference of products can be direct or indirect
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - add mandatory test for contradicting remediations - add invalid examples - add valid examples
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - remove duplicate notes about mutually exclusive categories - add table for contradicting product status group remediation category combinations
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - add mandatory test for contradicting Product status remediations combinations - add invalid examples - add valid examples
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - fix spelling mistake - improve wording - clarify that this also applies to indirect relationships through product groups
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - add optional test for discouraged product status remediation combinations - add invalid examples - add valid examples
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541, oasis-tcs#662, oasis-tcs#563 - correct example - add valid example - add invalid example
The following tables shows the allowed and prohibited combinations: | ||
|
||
| category value | `workaround` | `mitigation` | `vendor_fix` | `optional_patch` | `none_available` | `fix_planned` | `no_fix_planned` | | ||
|:----------------:|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|:----------------:|:----------------:|:-------------:|:----------------:| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about left-aligning the cell values (instead of centering)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The following tables shows the allowed, discouraged and prohibited combinations: | ||
|
||
| category value | Affected | Not Affected | Fixed | Under Investigation | Recommended | | ||
|:----------------:|:----------:|:------------:|:-----------:|:-------------------:|:-----------:| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about left-aligning also here the cell values (instead of centering)?
> A tool MAY apply the conversion rules from the conformance target CSAF 2.0 to CSAF 2.1 converter if applicable or | ||
> remove the product from the remediation with the lower priority. | ||
> The priority MAY be defined as follows: | ||
> `vendor_fix` > `mitigation` > `workaround` > `fix_planned` > `no_fix_planned` > `optional_patch` > `none_available` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am always tempted to right the escaped > for these relation ships, but if a bare greater works 🆗
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vendor_fix
>mitigation
>workaround
>fix_planned
>no_fix_planned
>optional_patch
>none_available
Looks like it does...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
...2.1/prose/edit/src/tests-01-mndtr-36-contradicting-product-status-remediation-combination.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#541 - add missing files to bind.txt
- addresses review comments from oasis-tcs#807 - convert unnecessary upper case to lower case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SLGTM.
LGTM @tschmidtb51. Thank You. |
A motion was moved by Thomas to include the changes suggested in this pull request, during the CSAF TC monthly meeting on 2024-10-30. The motion was seconded by Omar. The motion passed. |
1475f37
into
oasis-tcs:editor-revision-2024-10-30
Add remediation category "fix_planned" #662