*: allow users to ask for minimal names

[stevekuznetsov]

The new --minimal-names flag allows users to ask the generator to come up with the most minimal name possible, meaning that redundant context prefixes are omitted and collection type names are inferred from field names where possible.

A real-world use-case JSON Schema is imported as a test case; some examples of names before and after:

RolloutSpecificationOrchestratedStepsElem -> OrchestratedStep RolloutSpecificationOrchestratedStepsElemApplicationsApplyAcrossServiceResources -> ApplyAcrossServiceResources

Fixes #297

[stevekuznetsov]

@omissis not sure how strongly you are attached to the wsl linter and the rules on "cuddling" but if I may give some feedback - the utility of that type of linting can be extremely low. Not allowing:

first := thing
second := other()
if second {

}

And instead requiring

first := thing

second := other()
if second {

}

Is a bit silly :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.32%. Comparing base (d963216) to head (df9ed50).
Report is 96 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #324      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.58%   73.32%   -3.26%     
==========================================
  Files          24       43      +19     
  Lines        1892     2853     +961     
==========================================
+ Hits         1449     2092     +643     
- Misses        354      588     +234     
- Partials       89      173      +84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[bbrcan]

This is fantastic. Looking forward to seeing it work across multiple schema files

[stevekuznetsov]

@omissis could you please review this in broad strokes? If you agree with the approach I'll rebase.

[omissis]

hey @stevekuznetsov sorry for the delay, I was dedicating all my attention to the subschemas implementation and I missed the new contribs :) I will try to look into this as soon as I can!
About the linters: I am not very attached to them, I simply try to fix the issues they raise unless they are incredibly annoying or silly, eg: I remember at some point a two := 2 was introduced to satisfy the magic number linter, after which I disabled it 😂 I don't have a strong opinion on the cuddling to be honest, sometimes I find it nice, sometimes it's a bit meh.

[stevekuznetsov]

@omissis no worries! Once you have cycles to give feedback on the direction of the open PRs I'll respond to comments, etc :)