fix: add capability to update existing secret

[olavtar]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NVPE-77

Description

Added the ability to update the existing secret with the new API key.

How Has This Been Tested?

• Tested by updating the secret.
• Tested by removing the account and trying to update the secret.

Test Impact

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[openshift-ci]

Hi @olavtar. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a opendatahub-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.40%. Comparing base (c187244) to head (6736b32).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3551      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.55%   85.40%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        1373     1378       +5     
  Lines       31195    31315     +120     
  Branches     8736     8761      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits        26689    26746      +57     
- Misses       4506     4569      +63     

see 11 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6fdafba...6736b32. Read the comment docs.

[emilys314]

/ok-to-test

[emilys314]

/lgtm

[andrewballantyne]

Nit, you should really put these in the same line

[emilys314]

/lgtm

[andrewballantyne]

I think this change is needed, please do it in a future PR.

Nothing else is wrong with this PR so I'm going to approve it; but it definitely could use with some wording update.

[andrewballantyne]

This needs to be named differently

Suggested change

	export const createNIMSecret = async (
	export const manageNIMSecret = async (

Or something else... it's not just creating it anymore. It's confusing to read the code.

[olavtar]

Ok, will update in the future PR. Thanks.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [andrewballantyne]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment