-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8347300: Don't exclude the "PATH" var from the environment when running app launchers in jpackage tests #22983
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
8347300: Don't exclude the "PATH" var from the environment when running app launchers in jpackage tests #22983
Conversation
…launchers in jpackage tests. Removal of the "PATH" var was a part of the JDK-8254920 fix. But this removal is redundant as JDK-8254920 was fixed by making jpackage app launcher not to look up for dll-s in the PATH. There are a few jpackage tests running app launchers without removing the PATH var from the environment - WinChildProcessTest, AppLauncherEnvTest. They proves that removal of the "PATH" var from the environment when testing app launchers is redundant. - Add support to remove any var from the environment in Executor class. - Add support for boolean property 'jpackage.test.clear-app-launcher-java-env-vars'. If set to true, "JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS" and "_JAVA_OPTIONS" will be removed from the environment when running app launchers. This is needed to support local jpackage test configurations when JRE used to run jpackage tests relies on these variables, but they should not be applied to runtimes of app launchers.
👋 Welcome back asemenyuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@alexeysemenyukoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@alexeysemenyukoracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@sashamatveev PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
PATH
variable from the environment when running app launchers in jpackage tests;Executor
rather thanHelloApp
class to run app launchers: apply the same changes to the environment as would be applied byHelloApp
class.Executor.setRemovePathEnvVar()
withExecutor.removeEnvVar()
to support removal of any variable from the environment of a child process executed in jpackage tests;jpackage.test.clear-app-launcher-java-env-vars
in jpackage tests. If it is set to "true", theJAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS
and_JAVA_OPTIONS
variables will be removed from the environment of app launchers executed in jpackage tests. It is handy in local testing using jpackage test runner instead of the jtreg.The first and the second changes are unrelated to other changes. They are bundled together as they apply to the same source code.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22983/head:pull/22983
$ git checkout pull/22983
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22983
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22983/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22983
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22983
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22983.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment