Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support for loose init model from run #1371

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

LennartPurucker
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #1006 #1005

Copy link
Collaborator

@eddiebergman eddiebergman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really know how to review this?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.27%. Comparing base (26ae499) to head (f806795).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1371      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.19%   84.27%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files           38       38              
  Lines         5303     5303              
===========================================
+ Hits          4465     4469       +4     
+ Misses         838      834       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eddiebergman eddiebergman changed the title add: support for loose init model from run feat: support for loose init model from run Oct 16, 2024
@LennartPurucker LennartPurucker merged commit c30cd14 into develop Oct 17, 2024
13 checks passed
@LennartPurucker LennartPurucker deleted the loose_reinitialization_new branch October 17, 2024 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants