Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add remote proxy pallet #535

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add remote proxy pallet #535

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bkchr
Copy link
Contributor

@bkchr bkchr commented Jan 9, 2025

  • Does not require a CHANGELOG entry

xlc
xlc reviewed Jan 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@xlc xlc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is not in polkadot-sdk repo so how do we want to test it on westend?

pallets/remote-proxy/src/lib.rs
/// The remote block number.
type RemoteBlockNumber: Parameter + Saturating + MaxEncodedLen + Default;
/// The hash type used by the remote chain.
type Hash: Parameter + MaxEncodedLen;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this pallet is in the runtime repo instead of polkadot-sdk so presumably it is only intended to be used by runtimes here. in that case, do we really need this to be that generic?

@bkchr
Copy link
Contributor Author

bkchr commented Jan 10, 2025

this is not in polkadot-sdk repo so how do we want to test it on westend?

I will also port it there. I wanted to include it in the next release if possible. People are having more and more these problems of proxies not being on AH and similar. This pallet could solve the issue without requiring a root referendum (we already had one and another is prepared AFAIK).

@bkchr bkchr mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xlc xlc xlc left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bkchr @xlc