Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[hotfix/gtfs] Ajusta flow para lidar com tabelas faltantes #547

Closed
wants to merge 60 commits into from

Conversation

lingsv
Copy link
Contributor

@lingsv lingsv commented Oct 27, 2023

  • Ajuste na função get_raw_data_gcs para exibir log de erro ao identificar uma tabela faltante;
  • Coloca constantes de extração nos parâmetros do flow de captura.

@lingsv lingsv added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 27, 2023
@lingsv lingsv self-assigned this Oct 27, 2023
@lingsv lingsv changed the title Ajusta flow para lidar com tabelas faltantes [hotfix/gtfs] Ajusta flow para lidar com tabelas faltantes Oct 27, 2023
mergify bot added 25 commits October 27, 2023 20:10
mergify bot added 28 commits January 15, 2024 19:30
Copy link

Análise da árvore de código

Os seguintes arquivos são afetados diretamente por alterações realizadas nesse pull request:
- pipelines/rj_smtr/veiculo/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/br_rj_riodejaneiro_sigmob/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/init.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/br_rj_riodejaneiro_rdo/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/registros_ocr_rir/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/br_rj_riodejaneiro_stpl_gps/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/projeto_subsidio_sppo/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/br_rj_riodejaneiro_gtfs/flows.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/utils.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/tasks.py
- pipelines/rj_smtr/br_rj_riodejaneiro_brt_gps/tasks.py

Os seguintes usuários devem ser avisados sobre a alteração:
- @pixuimpou
- @lingsv
- @eng-rodrigocunha
- @Hellcassius
- @borismarinho
- @fernandascovino

@lingsv lingsv closed this Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants