Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(BUGFIX) Correct disable_autoloader_layout Lint config #477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

david22swan
Copy link
Member

@david22swan david22swan commented Oct 18, 2024

Noticed this as I was reviewing the lint rake task for another ticket. As it stands the configuration being sent looks to be disable_disable_autoloader_layout, which I doubt is correct.

Checklist

  • 🟢 Spec tests.
  • 🟢 Acceptance tests.
  • Manually verified.

Noticed this as I was reviewing the lint rake task for another ticket. As it stands the configuration being sent looks to be `disable_disable_autoloader_layout`, which I doubt is correct.
@david22swan david22swan requested review from bastelfreak and a team as code owners October 18, 2024 10:15
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.95%. Comparing base (75239c8) to head (6f01739).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #477   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.95%   43.95%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         662      662           
=======================================
  Hits          291      291           
  Misses        371      371           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@LukasAud LukasAud merged commit d580571 into main Oct 21, 2024
10 checks passed
@LukasAud LukasAud deleted the disable_autoloader_layout branch October 21, 2024 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants