Try to add an inductive definition of a multivector #2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Moved from #1, this is easier to look at as a PR.
The payoff of all this is that
gives
The concepts of
blade
,hom_mv
, andmultivector
seem to match the chisholm definitions.The types here do not enforce that the blade vectors are orthogonal, but I don't know how that would be done.
I'm really not happy with:
my use ofFixed!cases a, cases b
here - there must be a better way to decompose the objects predictably.coe
operations chain automatically