Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New standard layout for Mechlovin' Zed60 (60_tsangan_hhkb) #24801

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ChrisGVE
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisGVE ChrisGVE commented Jan 8, 2025

The change is the addition of a missing standard tsangan/hhkb layout to keyboard.json (60_tsangan_hhkb).

Description

Currently, the keyboard ANSI layouts offer various standard layouts except the tsangan hhkb version (7u spacebar). This pull request adds the missing layout.

The change is included in the keyboard.json file, which has been checked with qmk format-json -i to apply the project standards to the file format.

Types of Changes

  • Core
  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement/optimization
  • Keyboard (addition or update)
  • Keymap/layout (addition or update)
  • Documentation

Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project: C, Python
  • I have read the PR Checklist document and have made the appropriate changes.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

@ChrisGVE ChrisGVE changed the title New standard layout for Zed (60_tsangan_) New standard layout for Zed (60_tsangan_hhkb) Jan 8, 2025
@ChrisGVE ChrisGVE changed the title New standard layout for Zed (60_tsangan_hhkb) New standard layout for Mechlovin' Zed60 (60_tsangan_hhkb) Jan 8, 2025
@ChrisGVE ChrisGVE force-pushed the zed60 branch 2 times, most recently from 536a7b0 to f951930 Compare January 9, 2025 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant