-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1197 npm build warnings in ci #1203
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice thanks for looking into it. However, I don't want the profile hints in watch
mode. But I want the export 'default'
warning. I thought about adding a warningsConfig
in webpack.config.js, but not if args.watch
is set. Or we add a build:testing
with a testingConfig
. What do you think?
yeah, also thought about adding another config. By adding a |
Yes, and |
9bc5100
to
48c2de7
Compare
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ | |||
"name": "rdmo", | |||
"scripts": { | |||
"build:prod": "webpack --config webpack.config.js --mode production", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest that build:prod
fails on warnings and testing
does not, but contains the performance hints.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ive added an object ignorePerformanceWarnings
that build:prod
build:dist
gets so that it can fail on other warnings
48c2de7
to
dff1508
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should name it different from testing
if the only difference is that the performance warnings are suppressed. build:warn
maybe? It could also fail on warnings i guess. We will probaly not use it much. But you can also merge right away.
what about |
dff1508
to
5ffd801
Compare
yes, I like it! But ... |
Signed-off-by: David Wallace <david.wallace@tu-darmstadt.de>
5ffd801
to
93e5ece
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks!
93e5ece
to
f0572f7
Compare
alright, the ci now uses |
Description
Related issue: #1197
Motivation and Context
How has this been tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate)