Add new scripts/New ToRORd model variant/New option to save the Purkinje on the Ensight save mesh function #71
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear Sachetto,
In this pull request, I am sending you some new "/scripts" to calibrate the monodomain conductivities using "tuneCV" alongside some other minor changes.
The main idea is to use the "tuneCV" to calibrate the values on a cable first using the algorithm proposed here (https://opencarp.org/documentation/examples/02_ep_tissue/03a_study_prep_tunecv). Next, we use the 'evaluateBenchmarkCV' script to run a 3D wedge simulation with the previously tuned conductivities to check their CVs. It is very simple, but we plan to improve in the future.
Another change in this pull request is a new option to the "save_as_ensight" function. You can now use a boolean value called "save_purkinje" to choose if you want the Purkinje to be written in the Ensight files during a Purkinje coupled simulation.
Finally, there is a new variant for the ToRORd model that we are using for a new paper called "ToRORd_fkatp_mixed_endo_mid_epi_GKsGKrtjca_adjustments".
After this pull request, there will another one with some change in the "monodomain_solver.c" since I am working on the Purkinje coupled code. I decided to break the pull requests in two parts, so that there will be not so many changes for you to look.
Best regards,
Lucas