Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new scripts/New ToRORd model variant/New option to save the Purkinje on the Ensight save mesh function #71

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

bergolho
Copy link
Contributor

@bergolho bergolho commented Jun 9, 2024

Dear Sachetto,

In this pull request, I am sending you some new "/scripts" to calibrate the monodomain conductivities using "tuneCV" alongside some other minor changes.

The main idea is to use the "tuneCV" to calibrate the values on a cable first using the algorithm proposed here (https://opencarp.org/documentation/examples/02_ep_tissue/03a_study_prep_tunecv). Next, we use the 'evaluateBenchmarkCV' script to run a 3D wedge simulation with the previously tuned conductivities to check their CVs. It is very simple, but we plan to improve in the future.

Another change in this pull request is a new option to the "save_as_ensight" function. You can now use a boolean value called "save_purkinje" to choose if you want the Purkinje to be written in the Ensight files during a Purkinje coupled simulation.

Finally, there is a new variant for the ToRORd model that we are using for a new paper called "ToRORd_fkatp_mixed_endo_mid_epi_GKsGKrtjca_adjustments".

After this pull request, there will another one with some change in the "monodomain_solver.c" since I am working on the Purkinje coupled code. I decided to break the pull requests in two parts, so that there will be not so many changes for you to look.

Best regards,
Lucas

@rsachetto rsachetto merged commit 201b6f7 into rsachetto:master Jun 10, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants