Support ITK-Elastix for groupwise registration #500
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Check for the package before setting this threader.
- Fall back to groupwise registration using ITK-Elastix if SimpleITK is not available - Support either library for reading or writing transformation files
Remove this function as it has not been used and can be replaced by other existing functions.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses #438. Extends support for ITK-Elastix to perform groupwise registration as an alternative to SimpleITK with Elastix. Also removes the remaining references to SimpleITK that would cause an error if the package is not loaded. We have removed the function to register atlas to labels since it is likely unused, and its functionality can be accessed through the other registration functions that now support ITK-Elastix.