update to dipy 1.10

[arnaudbore]

Quick description

Update to dipy 1.10

...

Type of change

Check the relevant options.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

Provide data, screenshots, command line to test (if relevant)

...

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project (run autopep8)
• I added relevant citations to scripts, modules and functions docstrings and descriptions
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I moved all functions from the script file (except the argparser and main) to scilpy modules
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.54%. Comparing base (c352faf) to head (0eb5b4d).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1114   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.54%   69.54%           
=======================================
  Files         448      448           
  Lines       24069    24069           
  Branches     3289     3289           
=======================================
  Hits        16739    16739           
  Misses       5938     5938           
  Partials     1392     1392           

Components	Coverage Δ
Scripts	70.25% <ø> (ø)
Library	68.60% <100.00%> (ø)

[EmmaRenauld]

If tests pass, then good to go.