Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

passkey connector apis #169

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

himanshuchawla009
Copy link
Member

Motivation and Context

Jira Link:

Description

How has this been tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project. (run lint)
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My code requires a db migration.

@himanshuchawla009 himanshuchawla009 marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 04:31
@@ -16,6 +12,13 @@ export interface TorusUtilsExtraParams {
rpOrigin?: string; // passkey, webauthn

rpId?: string; // passkey, webauthn
}
export interface TorusUtilsExtraParams extends TorusUtilsPasskeyExtraParams {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just question,
can we use just add TorusUtilsPasskeyExtraParams as a field in TorusUtilsExtraParams ?

Suggested change
export interface TorusUtilsExtraParams extends TorusUtilsPasskeyExtraParams {
export interface TorusUtilsExtraParams {
passkeyParams: TorusUtilsPasskeyExtraParams

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's a good idea, we can do it in next breaking version. This change is not related to passkey linking. These are params for existing passkey/webauthn verifiers. I just divided it in seperate interface. We can do the change you are suggesting in next breaking version.

Copy link

@ieow ieow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants