Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Create codeql-analysis.yml #11

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create codeql-analysis.yml #11

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

DrShaneGreen
Copy link

This pull request enables GitHub Advanced Security, but most importantly, enables CodeQL on your repository.

The purpose of this issue is:

  1. Give you some context as to why this pull request was created.
  2. Provide you with some links to help you understand what CodeQL and GitHub Advanced Security are.
  3. Help you with some automated entries instead of doing this manually.

As a company, we are moving towards CodeQL for our static analysis tool. We didn't want to go and raise a pull request for every repository manually, and we didn't expect you to have to go and manually create a pull request for every single repositor either. So here is a pull request for you to review and hopefully approve!

We are rolling out CodeQL per language/user, so if you have only got a pull request for a few of your repositories, not to worry, more will come soon.

Hopefully, you should see a nice green status tick next to CodeQL within the status section of the pull request. However, if you haven't, that's understandable. We have taken the best guess approach at configuring CodeQL for you, but 1) we are still maturing, and 2) codeql can differ repository by repository.

If you have a red X next to CodeQL, that means that CodeQL is not configured for your repository. You may need to go ahead and edit the codeql-analysis.yml file to get it working with your build process/codebase. Some information on that can be found below:

  1. Complied Languages with CodeQL
  2. Configuring Code Scanning.

If you need any more assistance, please don't hesitate to contact the Application Security team. We are here to help.

Thanks!

This pull request enables [GitHub Advanced Security](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github/about-github-advanced-security), but most importantly, enables [CodeQL](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/about-code-scanning-with-codeql) on your repository. 

The purpose of this issue is:

1) Give you some context as to why this pull request was created.
2) Provide you with some links to help you understand what CodeQL and GitHub Advanced Security are.
3) Help you with some automated entries instead of doing this manually. 

As a company, we are moving towards CodeQL for our static analysis tool. We didn't want to go and raise a pull request for every repository manually, and we didn't expect you to have to go and manually create a pull request for every single repositor either. So here is a pull request for you to review and hopefully approve!

We are rolling out CodeQL per language/user, so if you have only got a pull request for a few of your repositories, not to worry, more will come soon. 

Hopefully, you should see a nice green status tick next to CodeQL within the status section of the pull request. However, if you haven't, that's understandable. We have taken the best guess approach at configuring CodeQL for you, but 1) we are still maturing, and 2) codeql can differ repository by repository. 

If you have a red X next to CodeQL, that means that CodeQL is not configured for your repository. You may need to go ahead and edit the codeql-analysis.yml file to get it working with your build process/codebase. Some information on that can be found below:

1) [Complied Languages with CodeQL](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/configuring-the-codeql-workflow-for-compiled-languages)
2) [Configuring Code Scanning](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/configuring-code-scanning).

If you need any more assistance, please don't hesitate to contact the Application Security team. We are here to help. 

Thanks!
- Application Security :) 
  Shane.Green@treasure-data.com
Made changes for the maven build
Updated yml file to pull the build from build.sh
Corrected spacing
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant