Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 571: Catch develop-2.0.0 up to develop #577

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Issue 571: Catch develop-2.0.0 up to develop #577

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

This is a maintenance, catch-up Pull Request, incorporating no new features. Once CI passes, it can be merged.

ajnelson-nist and others added 7 commits December 4, 2023 21:41
A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

References:
* #571

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References:
* #571

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
This causes `ValidationResult`s to yield sufficient information to find
the whole triple that should have used a sequence.  With the prior
spelling, only the object of the triple would have been directly
identified; the predicate could be manually deduced from the shape name;
and the subject was completely absent from the validation result.

The noted comment on PR 572 illustrates the difference in results when
testing CASE-Corpora.  The issue is replicated as new PASS and XFAIL
test members.

A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

References:
* #571
* #572 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References:
* #571
* #572 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Issue 571: Reduce UCO OWL RDF List review scope to OWL Sequences
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist added this to the UCO 2.0.0 milestone Jan 19, 2024
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2024 18:50
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist requested a review from a team January 19, 2024 18:50
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ucoProject/maintainers-uco : This is ready for merge.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist linked an issue Jan 19, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
15 tasks
@plbt5 plbt5 merged commit 3ff950e into develop-2.0.0 Jan 22, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

UCO OWL review of RDF List was scoped too broadly
2 participants