feat: oss.gg accessibility audit #2328
Conversation
…ity-1 Update 2_accessibility_advocate.md
Emmarie-Ahtunan
requested review from
perkinsjr,
chronark,
mcstepp and
MichaelUnkey
as code owners
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
@Emmarie-Ahtunan is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new section titled "Side Quest: Accessibility Advocate" in the document Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
oss.gg/2_accessibility_advocate.md (3)
Line range hint
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding more specific guidelines for the accessibility audit.The content clearly outlines the task, points system, and proof requirements for the accessibility audit. It's great that you emphasize the importance of original findings.
To further improve this section, consider adding:
- A brief list of key areas to focus on during the audit (e.g., color contrast, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility).
- Links to accessibility guidelines or tools that participants can use for the audit.
This additional information would help participants conduct more thorough and effective audits.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~5-~5: If you want to indicate numerical ranges or time ranges, consider using an en dash.
Context: ...on’t copy from others⚠️ Points: 50 - 300 points depending on the severity **...(DASH_RULE)
[misspelling] ~7-~7: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...en a bug issue in our repository incl. screen shots if relevant.  *Description: This screenshot highlights areas where text color doesn't provide sufficient contrast with the background, potentially making it difficult for some users to read.* ### Keyboard Navigation  *Description: This image shows elements that are not properly accessible via keyboard navigation, which can pose challenges for users who rely on keyboard-only interaction.*By providing this context, you'll make the audit results more actionable and easier to understand for those reviewing the findings.
Line range hint
1-22: Great start on the accessibility audit documentation. Consider enhancing its structure and content.The inclusion of both task description and visual evidence from the audit tool is commendable. To further improve the document and make it more valuable:
- Add an introduction explaining the importance of accessibility and the specific goals of this audit.
- Organize the findings into categories (e.g., color contrast, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility).
- For each category:
- Provide a brief explanation of why it's important for accessibility.
- Show the relevant screenshot(s).
- Describe the specific issues found.
- Suggest potential solutions or improvements.
- Include a summary section that highlights the most critical issues and outlines next steps.
- Consider adding a section on the methodology used for the audit, including any tools or guidelines followed.
This structured approach will not only make the document more comprehensive but also serve as a better guide for addressing the identified accessibility issues. It will also demonstrate a thorough understanding of accessibility principles, which aligns well with the "Accessibility Advocate" side quest objective.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~5-~5: If you want to indicate numerical ranges or time ranges, consider using an en dash.
Context: ...on’t copy from others⚠️ Points: 50 - 300 points depending on the severity **...(DASH_RULE)
[misspelling] ~7-~7: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...en a bug issue in our repository incl. screen shots if relevant. 
What does this PR do?
Fixes #2327
If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists
Bug fix recommendations
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit