Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove sonarCube config #203

Closed

Conversation

ShriD2003
Copy link

@ShriD2003 ShriD2003 commented Aug 9, 2024

Removed the sonarCube config in CI/CD

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the continuous deployment workflow to better align with the "react-itunes" project.
    • Updated the continuous integration workflow to focus specifically on the "react-itunes" project.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed the SonarQube scanning step from both CI and CD workflows, simplifying the deployment process.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve the renaming of continuous integration and deployment workflows to better align with the "react-itunes" project. Additionally, the workflows have eliminated the SonarQube scanning steps, streamlining the processes. These adjustments indicate a shift in focus towards the project while simplifying the overall CI/CD pipeline.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/cd.yml, Renamed workflow from "React Template CD" to "react-itunes CD" and removed the "SonarQube Scan" job.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Renamed workflow from "React Template CI" to "react-itunes CI" and removed the "SonarQube Scan" step.

Poem

🐇 In a garden bright, the workflows dance,
"React ITunes" now takes its chance!
With scans removed, oh what a breeze,
Simplicity reigns, as code flows with ease.
Hops of joy in the CI night,
Celebrate these changes, all feels just right! 🎶


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ShriD2003
Copy link
Author

created by mistake.

@ShriD2003 ShriD2003 closed this Aug 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7740866 and 96b0465.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/cd.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

1-1: Workflow Name Change: Align with Project Focus

The workflow name has been updated to reflect the project's focus on "react-itunes." This change enhances clarity and alignment with the specific project.


1-1: Removal of SonarQube Scan: Verify Impact on Code Quality

The SonarQube scan step has been removed, which simplifies the CI process. However, ensure that code quality checks are maintained through other means or tools.

Verification successful

Alternative Code Quality Checks Are Present

The removal of the SonarQube scan does not leave the CI process without code quality checks. Other steps such as yarn lint:ci, yarn test, and yarn test-storybook:ci are in place to ensure code quality.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if there are alternative code quality checks in place.

# Test: Search for any code quality related steps in the workflow files. Expect: Presence of other quality checks.
rg --type yaml 'lint|test|quality' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 882

.github/workflows/cd.yml (2)

1-1: Workflow Name Change: Align with Project Focus

The workflow name has been updated to reflect the project's focus on "react-itunes." This change enhances clarity and alignment with the specific project.


1-1: Removal of SonarQube Scan: Verify Impact on Deployment Quality

The SonarQube scan job has been removed, which simplifies the CD process. Ensure that code quality checks are maintained during deployment through other means or tools.

Verification successful

Code Quality Checks Present in CD Workflow

The removal of the SonarQube scan is mitigated by the presence of other code quality checks. The cd.yml workflow includes yarn lint and yarn run test:badges, ensuring code quality during deployment. Additionally, the ci.yml workflow includes yarn lint:ci and yarn test, further supporting quality assurance.

  • .github/workflows/cd.yml: yarn lint, yarn run test:badges
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml: yarn lint:ci, yarn test
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if there are alternative code quality checks in place during deployment.

# Test: Search for any code quality related steps in the deployment workflow files. Expect: Presence of other quality checks.
rg --type yaml 'lint|test|quality' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 882

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant