Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renovate bug: already updated. #2825

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@babel/eslint-parser (source) 7.23.9 -> 7.23.10 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

babel/babel (@​babel/eslint-parser)

v7.23.10

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@manuelleduc manuelleduc self-assigned this Jan 31, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update dependency @babel/eslint-parser to v7.23.9 Update dependency @babel/eslint-parser to v7.23.10 Jan 31, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/babel-eslint-parser-7.x branch from 541bf0d to d3182fa Compare January 31, 2024 12:27
@surli surli changed the title Update dependency @babel/eslint-parser to v7.23.10 Renovate bug: already updated. Feb 26, 2024
@surli surli closed this Feb 26, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/babel-eslint-parser-7.x branch March 12, 2024 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants