Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hide radius accounting secret for Extreme Networks XOS #3344

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

iriseden
Copy link
Contributor

Pre-Request Checklist

  • Passes rubocop code analysis (try rubocop --auto-correct)
  • Tests added or adapted (try rake test)
  • Changes are reflected in the documentation
  • User-visible changes appended to CHANGELOG.md

Description

Hide radius accounting secret for Extreme Networks XOS

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 12, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.42%. Comparing base (e740b60) to head (9942d81).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3344      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.39%   70.42%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines        3199     3202       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2252     2255       +3     
  Misses        947      947              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@robertcheramy robertcheramy merged commit c0c47bd into ytti:master Dec 17, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants