chore: adds recent GH + CodeRabbit configs #29
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new configuration files and workflows for the CodeRabbit integration, enhancing automated processes for code reviews and releases. A new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
data.tf (1)
Line range hint
4-11: Update data source name and comment to reflect Amazon Linux 2The data source name and comment suggest Amazon Linux 2023, but the filter is now looking for Amazon Linux 2 AMIs. This inconsistency could be confusing for future maintainers.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
- # Most recent Amazon Linux 2023 AMI - data "aws_ami" "amazon_linux_2023" { + # Most recent Amazon Linux 2 AMI + data "aws_ami" "amazon_linux_2" {.github/lint.yaml (3)
7-7: Consider being more specific with the trigger configurationThe current trigger runs on all pull request events. To optimize workflow execution, consider specifying relevant event types.
-on: pull_request +on: + pull_request: + types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
16-23: Enhance trunk-check job with caching and timeoutWhile the job configuration is solid, consider adding caching and timeout limits to improve performance and reliability.
trunk-check: runs-on: ubuntu-latest + timeout-minutes: 10 steps: - name: Check out Git repository uses: actions/checkout@v4 + - name: Cache Trunk + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: ~/.cache/trunk + key: trunk-${{ runner.os }}-${{ hashFiles('**/.trunk/trunk.yaml') }} - name: Trunk Check uses: trunk-io/trunk-action@4d5ecc89b2691705fd08c747c78652d2fc806a94 # v1.1.19
24-29: Add timeout to conventional-title jobConsider adding a timeout to prevent potential hanging jobs.
conventional-title: runs-on: ubuntu-latest + timeout-minutes: 5 steps: - uses: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@0723387faaf9b38adef4775cd42cfd5155ed6017 # v5.5.3 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}.github/trunk-upgrade.yaml (2)
21-21: Consider using version tag instead of commit hashWhile using a commit hash provides immutability, it makes version tracking and updates less intuitive. Consider using the version tag directly:
- uses: trunk-io/trunk-action/upgrade@2eaee169140ec559bd556208f9f99cdfdf468da8 # v1.1.18 + uses: trunk-io/trunk-action/upgrade@v1.1.18
23-25: Consider a more specific commit prefixThe current prefix "chore: " is good, but could be more specific to help with changelog organization. Consider using "chore(deps): " to clearly indicate dependency updates.
- prefix: "chore: " + prefix: "chore(deps): ".coderabbit.yaml (4)
19-24: Consider repository-specific knowledge base requirementsAll knowledge base scopes are set to 'global', which means they'll use organization-wide learnings. While this can be beneficial for consistency, consider if any repository-specific knowledge should be maintained locally.
27-27: Document the 'chill' profile characteristicsConsider adding a comment explaining what the 'chill' profile entails to help future maintainers understand the review behavior.
- profile: chill + # The 'chill' profile provides balanced feedback focusing on significant issues + # while being less strict about minor stylistic concerns + profile: chill
30-33: Consider expanding ignore keywordsThe ignore keywords list could be enhanced with additional common patterns.
ignore_title_keywords: - wip - draft - test + - do-not-review + - no-review + - work-in-progress
44-90: Consider selective tool enablementWhile using Trunk is great, some CodeRabbit tools might provide complementary value. Consider enabling specific tools that don't overlap with Trunk's functionality or provide additional insights.
For example:
languagetoolfor documentation reviewgitleaksfor additional security scanningcheckovfor infrastructure-specific checks
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks).github/lint.yaml(1 hunks).github/release-please.yaml(1 hunks).github/trunk-upgrade.yaml(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)aqua.yaml(1 hunks)data.tf(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/release-please.yaml
- .gitignore
- aqua.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
data.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
data.tf (1)
11-11: Verify AMI selection strategy
Switching from Amazon Linux 2023 to Amazon Linux 2 appears to be a regression since AL2023 is newer. While this might solve the immediate SSM agent issue, consider:
- AL2023 is the recommended choice for new deployments
- AL2 will eventually reach end-of-life (December 31, 2025)
If SSM agent is the concern, consider:
- Using AL2023 with a more specific filter to ensure SSM agent presence
- Documenting why AL2 is specifically required
Let's verify the available AMIs and their SSM agent status:
Consider adding explicit tags or filters to ensure SSM agent presence, regardless of the chosen AMI:
filter {
name = "name"
values = ["al2023-ami-*"]
}
filter {
name = "description"
values = ["*with SSM*"] # Adjust pattern based on actual AMI descriptions
}.github/lint.yaml (1)
9-13: Well-structured permissions following security best practices!
The permissions configuration follows the principle of least privilege, granting only the necessary access levels required for the workflow to function.
.github/trunk-upgrade.yaml (2)
3-7: Verify cron schedule timezone impact
The cron schedule is set to run at 8 AM on the first day of each month. Note that GitHub Actions uses UTC timezone, so this will run at 8 AM UTC. Ensure this timing aligns with your team's working hours and maintenance windows.
10-15: LGTM! Well-configured job permissions
The job permissions are properly scoped with the minimum required access levels for trunk upgrade operations.
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
11-11: Verify early access feature compatibility
The configuration enables early access features. Please ensure that all team members have access to these features and that they are stable enough for your use case.
data.tf
Outdated
| @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ data "aws_ami" "amazon_linux_2023" { | |||
|
|
|||
| filter { | |||
| name = "name" | |||
| values = ["al2023-ami*"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 - this is the only thing to review.
data.tf
Outdated
| @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ data "aws_ami" "amazon_linux_2023" { | |||
|
|
|||
| filter { | |||
| name = "name" | |||
| values = ["al2023-ami*"] | |||
| values = ["amzn2-ami-hvm-2.0.*"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm confused about this one. AL2 is OLDER than AL2023. Why are we needing to revert back? Can you explain what the issue was and where you found it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The issue was that the fetched AMI didn't contain SSM agent.
I've tried reproducing the issue, but it didn't happen. I assume it was some old local terraform cache with one of the previous versions of this module. Just did a cleanup and tested it - all went well. Reverting this back, thank you!
gberenice
changed the title
what
During the recent testing of a root module that uses this child module, I encountered an issue when the data source fetched an old AMI that didn't contain an SSM agent. This PR updates the filter to prevent this issue.why
Prevent fetching old AMI.references
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
.DS_Storeto.gitignoreto prevent unnecessary file tracking.