-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: adds GH + CRabbit configs #6
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new configuration and documentation files to enhance the CodeRabbit integration and repository management. A new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
8283d5f
to
e9b4889
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, interested to see how the Coderabbit configs will turn out
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
examples/complete/README.md (2)
25-33
: Consider clarifying the use oftofu
commandThe commands use
tofu
instead of the more commonterraform
command. It would be helpful to add a note explaining this choice or providing context about OpenTofu vs Terraform.Consider adding a note before the commands, such as:
+> Note: This example uses OpenTofu (`tofu` command) instead of Terraform. The commands are compatible with both tools. + 3. Initialize Terraform: ```sh tofu init ```
Line range hint
1-38
: Consider restructuring the prerequisites sectionThe prerequisites section could be more structured to improve readability and ensure users don't miss critical setup steps.
Consider reorganizing it like this:
1. Prerequisites: + - Environment Setup: + - Configure Spacelift API keys as environment variables (`SPACELIFT_API_KEY_*`) + - Ensure appropriate AWS permissions are configured + + - Configuration Files: - Replace the following configuration files with your own values: - `backend.tf.json`: Configure your Terraform backend settings - `example.tfvars`: Set your Spacelift configuration variables - `example.yaml`: Define your stack configuration
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.coderabbit.yaml
(1 hunks).github/CODEOWNERS
(1 hunks).github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
(1 hunks).trunk/configs/.markdownlint.yaml
(1 hunks)examples/complete/README.md
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .coderabbit.yaml
- .github/CODEOWNERS
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- .trunk/configs/.markdownlint.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
examples/complete/README.md (1)
19-20
: Great addition of API key documentation!
The link to Spacelift API key documentation provides valuable context for users setting up the environment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few questions + comments, but looking great!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
27-27
: Consider documenting the 'chill' profile settingIt would be helpful to add a comment explaining what the 'chill' profile entails and how it affects the review behavior.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.coderabbit.yaml (4)
1-12
: Well-structured configuration header and basic settings!
The configuration includes helpful documentation links and clear tone instructions that promote constructive feedback.
13-25
: Excellent choice of global scope for knowledge sharing!
Setting global scope for learnings, issues, and pull requests will help maintain consistency across the organization's repositories and leverage shared knowledge effectively.
44-90
: Good decision to avoid tool overlap!
The clear documentation about using Trunk and disabling overlapping tools helps prevent duplicate feedback and keeps the review process streamlined.
26-38
: Consider investigating comment volume control options
As mentioned in previous reviews, it would be beneficial to explore options for limiting the number of comments per PR to reduce noise. Consider reaching out to CodeRabbit support for guidance on this feature.
Run this script to check if there's any documentation about comment limiting in the schema:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gberenice !!
what
why
references
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes