Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta: add codeowners of security release document #56521

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RafaelGSS
Copy link
Member

As titled

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/tsc

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Jan 8, 2025
@@ -171,6 +171,9 @@
/src/permission/* @nodejs/security-wg
/test/parallel/test-permission-* @nodejs/security-wg

# Security Release
/doc/contributing/security-release-process.md @nodejs/security-release
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure this is the right group for codeowners. The people who follow this process are the security stewards, most of whom are not members of security-release (which is more or less releasers).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(There is a team for the security stewards, but only in the private org. -- I'm not sure if that's an oversight because the other security-* teams are replicated between the two orgs.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I change it to @nodejs/security? We don't have a security stewards group but we could create if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants