Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: Update Validator and ToBeValidated #57

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

GiaBaorr
Copy link
Collaborator

@GiaBaorr GiaBaorr commented Jan 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Updated validation mechanism for signup process.
    • Replaced ToValidated interface with ToBeValidated abstract class.
    • Modified validation logic to directly add error messages to the DTO.
    • Changed validation method to modify object state instead of returning messages.
  • New Features

    • Introduced a new abstract class for handling validation errors.
    • Enhanced error tracking during the user signup process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a significant refactoring of the validation mechanism in the project. The changes involve replacing the ToValidated interface with a new abstract class ToBeValidated, which provides a more comprehensive approach to handling validation errors. The validation process has been modified to directly add error messages to the object being validated, instead of returning optional messages. This change affects multiple classes in the validation and service layers, including SignupDTO, UserServiceImpl, SignupValidator, and the Validator interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
sep490-idp/src/main/java/.../SignupDTO.java Changed inheritance from implementing ToValidated interface to extending ToBeValidated abstract class
sep490-idp/src/main/java/.../UserServiceImpl.java Updated validation method to use new validate() approach and check validation status directly
sep490-idp/src/main/java/.../SignupValidator.java Replaced getValidateFirstMessage() with validate() method that directly modifies DTO with error messages
sep490-idp/src/main/java/.../ToValidated.java Removed interface completely
sep490-idp/src/main/java/.../ToBeValidated.java New abstract class added with validation-related fields and methods
sep490-idp/src/main/java/.../Validator.java Updated generic type constraint and method signature

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant UserService
    participant SignupValidator
    participant SignupDTO

    Client->>UserService: signup request
    UserService->>SignupValidator: validate(signupDTO)
    SignupValidator->>SignupDTO: addError(key, message)
    SignupValidator->>SignupDTO: checkValidated()
    SignupDTO-->>SignupValidator: validation status
    SignupValidator-->>UserService: validation result
    UserService-->>Client: signup response
Loading

Poem

🐰 Validation's dance, a rabbit's delight,
From interface to class, we've changed the fight!
No more optional messages to parse,
Errors now leap directly, with rabbity flair!
A new validation path, both clever and bright! 🌟

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java (1)

Line range hint 21-22: Add cross-field validation for password confirmation.

While the individual field validations are good, there's no validation to ensure confirmPassword matches password. Consider adding a custom validation annotation or implementing the validation logic in ToBeValidated.

Here's a suggested approach using a custom annotation:

@PasswordMatch(message = "{validation.password.mismatch}")
public class SignupDTO extends ToBeValidated {
    // existing fields...
}

@Constraint(validatedBy = PasswordMatchValidator.class)
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@interface PasswordMatch {
    String message() default "Passwords don't match";
    Class<?>[] groups() default {};
    Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
}
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java (2)

14-16: Enhance field safety and consider thread synchronization

Several improvements could be made to the field declarations:

  1. The errorMap should be made final to prevent null assignment
  2. Consider making it thread-safe if used in concurrent contexts
  3. The errorMsg field seems redundant with errorMap
     private boolean validated = false;
-    private Map<String, String> errorMap = new HashMap<>();
+    private final Map<String, String> errorMap = new HashMap<>();
-    private String errorMsg;

12-12: Add documentation and consider validation lifecycle hooks

The abstract class would benefit from:

  1. Clear Javadoc explaining its purpose, usage, and contract for subclasses
  2. Protected lifecycle hooks for subclasses to customize validation behavior
+/**
+ * Abstract base class for objects that require validation.
+ * Subclasses should implement their specific validation logic
+ * and use the error handling methods provided by this class.
+ */
 public abstract class ToBeValidated {
+    
+    /**
+     * Called before validation starts.
+     * Subclasses can override to perform initialization.
+     */
+    protected void beforeValidation() {}
+
+    /**
+     * Called after validation completes.
+     * Subclasses can override to perform cleanup.
+     */
+    protected void afterValidation() {}
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java (4)

42-43: Consider adding debug logging for validation failures

Adding debug logging would help with troubleshooting validation issues in production.

        validator.validate(signupDTO);
+       if (log.isDebugEnabled() && !signupDTO.isValidated()) {
+           log.debug("Validation failed for signup DTO: {}", signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse("No message"));
+       }
        if (!signupDTO.isValidated()) {

45-45: Avoid potential null error messages

The getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null) could lead to null error messages being set. Consider providing a default error message instead.

-           result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null));
+           result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse("Validation failed. Please check your input."));

42-47: Consider restructuring the success flag initialization

The success flag is initially set to true and then potentially set to false after validation. Consider initializing it based on the validation result to avoid the potential for inconsistent states.

        SignupResult result = new SignupResult();
        result.setRedirectUrl("redirect:/login");
-       result.setSuccess(true);

        validator.validate(signupDTO);
-       if (!signupDTO.isValidated()) {
-           result.setSuccess(false);
-           result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null));
-           result.setRedirectUrl("signup");
-       }
+       boolean isValid = signupDTO.isValidated();
+       result.setSuccess(isValid);
+       if (!isValid) {
+           result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse("Validation failed. Please check your input."));
+           result.setRedirectUrl("signup");
+       }

42-47: Consider extracting URL management to constants

The redirect URLs are hardcoded strings. Consider extracting them to constants for better maintainability.

+    private static final String LOGIN_REDIRECT_URL = "redirect:/login";
+    private static final String SIGNUP_URL = "signup";

     private SignupResult validateSignupDTO(SignupDTO signupDTO) {
         SignupResult result = new SignupResult();
-        result.setRedirectUrl("redirect:/login");
+        result.setRedirectUrl(LOGIN_REDIRECT_URL);
         result.setSuccess(true);

         validator.validate(signupDTO);
         if (!signupDTO.isValidated()) {
             result.setSuccess(false);
             result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null));
-            result.setRedirectUrl("signup");
+            result.setRedirectUrl(SIGNUP_URL);
         }
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java (1)

8-12: Enhance method documentation for validation behavior.

The current documentation could be more specific about:

  1. The validation process and error handling
  2. The state changes in the validated object
  3. Expected behavior when validation fails

Consider updating the javadoc:

     /**
-     * Validate the whole object and set value to flag and map
+     * Validates the object and updates its internal validation state.
      *
      * @param toValidate the object to be validated
+     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the object is null
+     * @see ToBeValidated for the contract on storing validation errors
      */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 155c9ee and 5180f3e.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java (0 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build Java Modules (sep490-common)
  • GitHub Check: Build Frontend
🔇 Additional comments (5)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java (2)

7-7: LGTM! Import changes align with the new validation architecture.

The import change correctly reflects the transition from the ToValidated interface to the new ToBeValidated abstract class.


13-13: Verify consistent adoption of ToBeValidated across DTOs.

The inheritance change from ToValidated interface to ToBeValidated abstract class looks good and aligns with the new validation architecture.

Let's verify that this architectural change has been consistently applied across other DTOs:

✅ Verification successful

Inheritance pattern is correctly implemented

The current inheritance structure is appropriate:

  • SignupDTO correctly extends ToBeValidated for complex validation
  • Other DTOs are either records, simple validation cases, or base types that don't require ToBeValidated functionality
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usages of the old ToValidated interface
# and verify consistent adoption of ToBeValidated

# Check for any remaining implementations of ToValidated
echo "Checking for remaining ToValidated implementations..."
rg "implements.*ToValidated" -g "*.java"

# Check for adoptions of ToBeValidated
echo "Checking ToBeValidated usage..."
rg "extends.*ToBeValidated" -g "*.java"

# Look for potential DTOs that might have been missed
echo "Checking for potential DTOs that might need updating..."
fd -e java -x grep -l "DTO" {} \; | xargs rg -L "ToBeValidated"

Length of output: 883


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all files with DTO in their name
echo "Files with DTO in their name:"
fd "DTO" -e java

# Show their content to verify if they are actually DTOs
echo -e "\nContent of found files:"
fd "DTO" -e java -x cat {}

Length of output: 6574

sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java (1)

4-4: Verify all implementations are updated for the breaking change.

The change from ToValidated to ToBeValidated is a breaking change that affects the entire validation hierarchy.

Run this script to verify all implementations are updated:

✅ Verification successful

Breaking change has been properly implemented

All implementations have been updated to use the new ToBeValidated base class. The validation chain is complete and consistent:

  • SignupDTO extends ToBeValidated
  • SignupValidator implements Validator<SignupDTO>
  • No traces of the old ToValidated remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all files that might need updates
echo "Checking for potential implementations that need updates..."

# Check for old ToValidated usage
echo "Files still using ToValidated:"
rg "ToValidated" -l

# Check for classes implementing Validator
echo "Validator implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements Validator'

# Check for classes extending ToBeValidated
echo "ToBeValidated implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends ToBeValidated'

Length of output: 682


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Case-insensitive search for validation-related types
echo "=== Searching for validation types ==="
rg -i "tovalidated|tobevalidated" --type java

echo -e "\n=== Checking for Validator implementations ==="
# Multiple patterns for implementing Validator
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$Validator<$_>'
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements Validator<$_>'

echo -e "\n=== Checking imports ==="
rg "^import.*\.(ToValidated|ToBeValidated|Validator)" --type java

Length of output: 1345


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking UserServiceImpl implementation ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "implements.*Validator|new.*Validator" sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java

echo -e "\n=== Checking SignupValidator references ==="
rg "SignupValidator" --type java

Length of output: 495

sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (2)

21-26: Well-structured validation approach!

Good implementation that collects all validation errors instead of stopping at the first one, providing better user experience by showing all issues simultaneously.


20-28: Verify password security requirements

The current validation only checks if passwords match. Consider adding additional security validations such as minimum length, complexity requirements, and common password checks.

Let's check if there are any password security requirements defined elsewhere:

@GiaBaorr GiaBaorr force-pushed the feature/authorization branch from 5180f3e to 003b8e6 Compare January 12, 2025 13:14
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1)

20-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix incorrect error key mapping for email validation

The email existence error is still being added to the "password" key instead of the "email" key.

Consider adding essential signup validations

The current validation is limited to password matching and email existence. Consider adding these essential validations:

  • Email format validation
  • Password complexity requirements (length, special characters, etc.)
  • Username requirements (if applicable)

Example implementation for additional validations:

     public void validate(SignupDTO dto) {
+        // Email format validation
+        if (!isValidEmailFormat(dto.getEmail())) {
+            dto.addError("email", "validation.email.invalid.format");
+        }
+        // Password complexity
+        if (!meetsPasswordComplexity(dto.getPassword())) {
+            dto.addError("password", "validation.password.invalid.complexity");
+        }
         if (!passwordsMatch(dto)) {
             dto.addError("password", "validation.password.invalid.notmatch");
         }
         if (userRepo.existsByEmail(dto.getEmail())) {
-            dto.addError("password", "validation.email.invalid.exist");
+            dto.addError("email", "validation.email.invalid.exist");
         }
         checkValidated(dto);
     }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1)

Line range hint 13-15: Consider improving testability

The validation logic in private helper methods makes it difficult to unit test individual validation rules. Consider:

  1. Extracting validation rules into separate, testable components
  2. Making helper methods protected for better testability

Example refactor:

 @Component
 @Qualifier("signupValidator")
 @RequiredArgsConstructor
-public class SignupValidator implements Validator<SignupDTO> {
+public class SignupValidator implements Validator<SignupDTO> {
+    protected interface ValidationRule {
+        boolean validate(SignupDTO dto);
+        String getErrorKey();
+        String getErrorMessage();
+    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5180f3e and 003b8e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java (1 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java (0 hunks)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java
  • sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build Frontend
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1)

30-33: Ensure complete validation state handling

The method only sets validated to false when errors exist, but doesn't handle the success case. This could leave the validation state undefined when there are no errors.

@GiaBaorr GiaBaorr merged commit 7d9e581 into main Jan 12, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants