-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature: Update Validator and ToBeValidated #57
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a significant refactoring of the validation mechanism in the project. The changes involve replacing the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant UserService
participant SignupValidator
participant SignupDTO
Client->>UserService: signup request
UserService->>SignupValidator: validate(signupDTO)
SignupValidator->>SignupDTO: addError(key, message)
SignupValidator->>SignupDTO: checkValidated()
SignupDTO-->>SignupValidator: validation status
SignupValidator-->>UserService: validation result
UserService-->>Client: signup response
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java (1)
Line range hint
21-22
: Add cross-field validation for password confirmation.While the individual field validations are good, there's no validation to ensure
confirmPassword
matchespassword
. Consider adding a custom validation annotation or implementing the validation logic inToBeValidated
.Here's a suggested approach using a custom annotation:
@PasswordMatch(message = "{validation.password.mismatch}") public class SignupDTO extends ToBeValidated { // existing fields... } @Constraint(validatedBy = PasswordMatchValidator.class) @Target(ElementType.TYPE) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @interface PasswordMatch { String message() default "Passwords don't match"; Class<?>[] groups() default {}; Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {}; }
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java (2)
14-16
: Enhance field safety and consider thread synchronizationSeveral improvements could be made to the field declarations:
- The
errorMap
should be made final to prevent null assignment- Consider making it thread-safe if used in concurrent contexts
- The
errorMsg
field seems redundant witherrorMap
private boolean validated = false; - private Map<String, String> errorMap = new HashMap<>(); + private final Map<String, String> errorMap = new HashMap<>(); - private String errorMsg;
12-12
: Add documentation and consider validation lifecycle hooksThe abstract class would benefit from:
- Clear Javadoc explaining its purpose, usage, and contract for subclasses
- Protected lifecycle hooks for subclasses to customize validation behavior
+/** + * Abstract base class for objects that require validation. + * Subclasses should implement their specific validation logic + * and use the error handling methods provided by this class. + */ public abstract class ToBeValidated { + + /** + * Called before validation starts. + * Subclasses can override to perform initialization. + */ + protected void beforeValidation() {} + + /** + * Called after validation completes. + * Subclasses can override to perform cleanup. + */ + protected void afterValidation() {}sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java (4)
42-43
: Consider adding debug logging for validation failuresAdding debug logging would help with troubleshooting validation issues in production.
validator.validate(signupDTO); + if (log.isDebugEnabled() && !signupDTO.isValidated()) { + log.debug("Validation failed for signup DTO: {}", signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse("No message")); + } if (!signupDTO.isValidated()) {
45-45
: Avoid potential null error messagesThe
getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null)
could lead to null error messages being set. Consider providing a default error message instead.- result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null)); + result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse("Validation failed. Please check your input."));
42-47
: Consider restructuring the success flag initializationThe success flag is initially set to true and then potentially set to false after validation. Consider initializing it based on the validation result to avoid the potential for inconsistent states.
SignupResult result = new SignupResult(); result.setRedirectUrl("redirect:/login"); - result.setSuccess(true); validator.validate(signupDTO); - if (!signupDTO.isValidated()) { - result.setSuccess(false); - result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null)); - result.setRedirectUrl("signup"); - } + boolean isValid = signupDTO.isValidated(); + result.setSuccess(isValid); + if (!isValid) { + result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse("Validation failed. Please check your input.")); + result.setRedirectUrl("signup"); + }
42-47
: Consider extracting URL management to constantsThe redirect URLs are hardcoded strings. Consider extracting them to constants for better maintainability.
+ private static final String LOGIN_REDIRECT_URL = "redirect:/login"; + private static final String SIGNUP_URL = "signup"; private SignupResult validateSignupDTO(SignupDTO signupDTO) { SignupResult result = new SignupResult(); - result.setRedirectUrl("redirect:/login"); + result.setRedirectUrl(LOGIN_REDIRECT_URL); result.setSuccess(true); validator.validate(signupDTO); if (!signupDTO.isValidated()) { result.setSuccess(false); result.setErrorMessage(signupDTO.getFirstErrorMsg().orElse(null)); - result.setRedirectUrl("signup"); + result.setRedirectUrl(SIGNUP_URL); }sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java (1)
8-12
: Enhance method documentation for validation behavior.The current documentation could be more specific about:
- The validation process and error handling
- The state changes in the validated object
- Expected behavior when validation fails
Consider updating the javadoc:
/** - * Validate the whole object and set value to flag and map + * Validates the object and updates its internal validation state. * * @param toValidate the object to be validated + * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the object is null + * @see ToBeValidated for the contract on storing validation errors */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java
(0 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Build Java Modules (sep490-common)
- GitHub Check: Build Frontend
🔇 Additional comments (5)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java (2)
7-7
: LGTM! Import changes align with the new validation architecture.The import change correctly reflects the transition from the
ToValidated
interface to the newToBeValidated
abstract class.
13-13
: Verify consistent adoption of ToBeValidated across DTOs.The inheritance change from
ToValidated
interface toToBeValidated
abstract class looks good and aligns with the new validation architecture.Let's verify that this architectural change has been consistently applied across other DTOs:
✅ Verification successful
Inheritance pattern is correctly implemented
The current inheritance structure is appropriate:
- SignupDTO correctly extends ToBeValidated for complex validation
- Other DTOs are either records, simple validation cases, or base types that don't require ToBeValidated functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of the old ToValidated interface # and verify consistent adoption of ToBeValidated # Check for any remaining implementations of ToValidated echo "Checking for remaining ToValidated implementations..." rg "implements.*ToValidated" -g "*.java" # Check for adoptions of ToBeValidated echo "Checking ToBeValidated usage..." rg "extends.*ToBeValidated" -g "*.java" # Look for potential DTOs that might have been missed echo "Checking for potential DTOs that might need updating..." fd -e java -x grep -l "DTO" {} \; | xargs rg -L "ToBeValidated"Length of output: 883
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all files with DTO in their name echo "Files with DTO in their name:" fd "DTO" -e java # Show their content to verify if they are actually DTOs echo -e "\nContent of found files:" fd "DTO" -e java -x cat {}Length of output: 6574
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java (1)
4-4
: Verify all implementations are updated for the breaking change.The change from
ToValidated
toToBeValidated
is a breaking change that affects the entire validation hierarchy.Run this script to verify all implementations are updated:
✅ Verification successful
Breaking change has been properly implemented
All implementations have been updated to use the new
ToBeValidated
base class. The validation chain is complete and consistent:
SignupDTO
extendsToBeValidated
SignupValidator
implementsValidator<SignupDTO>
- No traces of the old
ToValidated
remain in the codebase🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all files that might need updates echo "Checking for potential implementations that need updates..." # Check for old ToValidated usage echo "Files still using ToValidated:" rg "ToValidated" -l # Check for classes implementing Validator echo "Validator implementations:" ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements Validator' # Check for classes extending ToBeValidated echo "ToBeValidated implementations:" ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends ToBeValidated'Length of output: 682
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Case-insensitive search for validation-related types echo "=== Searching for validation types ===" rg -i "tovalidated|tobevalidated" --type java echo -e "\n=== Checking for Validator implementations ===" # Multiple patterns for implementing Validator ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$Validator<$_>' ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements Validator<$_>' echo -e "\n=== Checking imports ===" rg "^import.*\.(ToValidated|ToBeValidated|Validator)" --type javaLength of output: 1345
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "=== Checking UserServiceImpl implementation ===" rg -A 5 -B 5 "implements.*Validator|new.*Validator" sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java echo -e "\n=== Checking SignupValidator references ===" rg "SignupValidator" --type javaLength of output: 495
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (2)
21-26
: Well-structured validation approach!Good implementation that collects all validation errors instead of stopping at the first one, providing better user experience by showing all issues simultaneously.
20-28
: Verify password security requirementsThe current validation only checks if passwords match. Consider adding additional security validations such as minimum length, complexity requirements, and common password checks.
Let's check if there are any password security requirements defined elsewhere:
5180f3e
to
003b8e6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1)
20-28
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionFix incorrect error key mapping for email validation
The email existence error is still being added to the "password" key instead of the "email" key.
Consider adding essential signup validations
The current validation is limited to password matching and email existence. Consider adding these essential validations:
- Email format validation
- Password complexity requirements (length, special characters, etc.)
- Username requirements (if applicable)
Example implementation for additional validations:
public void validate(SignupDTO dto) { + // Email format validation + if (!isValidEmailFormat(dto.getEmail())) { + dto.addError("email", "validation.email.invalid.format"); + } + // Password complexity + if (!meetsPasswordComplexity(dto.getPassword())) { + dto.addError("password", "validation.password.invalid.complexity"); + } if (!passwordsMatch(dto)) { dto.addError("password", "validation.password.invalid.notmatch"); } if (userRepo.existsByEmail(dto.getEmail())) { - dto.addError("password", "validation.email.invalid.exist"); + dto.addError("email", "validation.email.invalid.exist"); } checkValidated(dto); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1)
Line range hint
13-15
: Consider improving testabilityThe validation logic in private helper methods makes it difficult to unit test individual validation rules. Consider:
- Extracting validation rules into separate, testable components
- Making helper methods protected for better testability
Example refactor:
@Component @Qualifier("signupValidator") @RequiredArgsConstructor -public class SignupValidator implements Validator<SignupDTO> { +public class SignupValidator implements Validator<SignupDTO> { + protected interface ValidationRule { + boolean validate(SignupDTO dto); + String getErrorKey(); + String getErrorMessage(); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java
(1 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java
(0 hunks)sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToValidated.java
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/dto/SignupDTO.java
- sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/ToBeValidated.java
- sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/service/impl/UserServiceImpl.java
- sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/Validator.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Build Frontend
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sep490-idp/src/main/java/sep490/idp/validation/SignupValidator.java (1)
30-33
: Ensure complete validation state handlingThe method only sets
validated
to false when errors exist, but doesn't handle the success case. This could leave the validation state undefined when there are no errors.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
ToValidated
interface withToBeValidated
abstract class.New Features